X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0) with ESMTP id 5959598 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:27:40 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=71.74.56.122; envelope-from=clouduster@austin.rr.com Return-Path: X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=O9a7TWBW c=1 sm=0 a=eTgKrshEm7xbomDJ3kHi1g==:17 a=409vFuCXsmoA:10 a=brslDM7j5zEA:10 a=05ChyHeVI94A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=3mQ0fDYx89cA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=WPfn0Nj-AAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=XhsEM3Y5R7AGEvg5ERkA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=Qa1je4BO31QA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=oQXBpyI1ny8A:10 a=eTgKrshEm7xbomDJ3kHi1g==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 72.182.13.24 Received: from [72.182.13.24] ([72.182.13.24:52821] helo=DWHPC) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id DE/A5-01424-A8582D05; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:27:07 +0000 Message-ID: <17BC6243C25D4D9DA37E4CD1FB44F76D@DWHPC> From: "Dennis Havarlah" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Duct Fabrication Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:26:58 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 Flying is good !!! Get Her Done - some day! Dennis H. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charlie E" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 3:38 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Duct Fabrication No variation of flow; just a cheap electric leaf blower for power. I'd like to build a cowl simulator around it to experiment with exit ducts but I'm running out of patience & want to get it flying. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 19, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Jim Brewer wrote: > Charlie, > I like your Youtube video. Did you vary the amount of air flow from very > low (like taxi) to very high (takeoff/cruise) and check the flow over the > face of the duct? If so, was the flow as even as in the video? > > Jim Brewer > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html