Thanks
Ed. This looks very cool and will
be lots of fun to play with.
Gordon
C. Alling, Jr., PE
President
acumen
Engineering/Analysis,
Inc.
540-786-2200
www.acumen-ea.com
From:
Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 10:08
AM
To: Rotary motors in
aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary]
Rotary Spreadsheet
Here
is a spreadsheet I spent quite a bit of time building and improving. The
power section I feel very confident in, the cooling section less so - just too
many variables that vary considerably from one installation to another.
The engine on the other hand is the engine and less variation between
installations.
I
do believe this can give you a useful tool for "what ifs" in planning your
installation and even better for inputting actual engine data and getting
estimates of what your power, fuel burn and heat rejection requirements
are.
This
is offered as an Educational tool, no warranty exists or is implied
{:>). The user accepts full responsibility for its use and
consequences.
The
spreadsheet is divided into two basic components. The Power section and
the Cooling section.
Attached
is a spreadsheet that can provide an approximation of your engine's
performance. In addition, it provides the HEAT in BTU that the coolant and
oil system must get rid of. You can change rpm, A/R ratio, manifold
pressure, OAT, number of rotors and gearbox ratio - any white cell on the
spreadsheet surrounded by bold blue boarders can be changed.
At
one time the spreadsheet tried to take input data on your induction system (such
as throttle body size, length of duct work, size of runners, etc) -
however, that just turned out to be pretty useless as every induction system
varied so much and some of the calculations got pretty esoteric
{:>)
I
finally realized that manifold pressure accurately represented the effectiveness
of any induction system (regardless of how unique{:>)) and
most folks had a manifold pressure gauge, so that change to the spreadsheet make
it considerably more accurate and useful. You can even input Turbo
manifold pressure, but be sure to change the "TURBO" block from NO to
YES.
Remember
this is NOT a
simulator - in other words, the values are not conditional on engine load,
another variable which is just too hard to try and quantify for each
installation. So these calculations are based primarily on fuel
flow and engine rpm and assumption that the engine can operate at the rpm you
are interested in. In other words, you can get this spreadsheet to show
your are producing 450 HP at 9000 rpm, but it ain't gonna happen in the real
world with any meaningful prop load on you engine. You can easily hit 9000
plus rpm without any engine load and a few folks have done it - and have
scattered parts of gear drive and engine into garage walls,
etc.
Now
if you are using the spreadsheet and inputting actual performance data from
your engine installation then the results are believe to be within 5% for
the power section.
Basically
you select the number of rotors which will limit the maximum airflow
through the N/A engine. The volume of the rotors and manifold
pressure you input then determines the airflow through the engine for each
rpm. IF you then select the Air/Fuel Ratio, that tells
the spreadsheet what fuel flow must be provided to match the airflow to give
your selected A/R. This combination is then used to calculate the heat
content of the fuel burned (in BTU units), from that total energy, allocations
for mechanical power, coolant heat and oil heat and exhaust are made.
Various other parameters are derived from these basic calculations and converted
to common parameters such as Fuel Flow in Gallons Per Hour, Heat rejection
required in BTU, etc.
Other
parameters such as prop torque and rpm are again derived from these calculations
and your input of gear ratio, etc.
The
spreadsheet is protected and no, I won't unprotect it. Years previous, I
did send out unprotected spreadsheets and well\-intended folks changed some of
the formulas and relationships which (in my opinion invalidated the spreadsheet)
and then distributed them with my John Hancock still
attached.
You
can extend the rpm range by changing its starting point or by changing the
interval from 100 to something different. Likewise, you can play with
intake temperature and Air/Fuel ratio to see how much effect those parameters
have
There
is also a cooling segment that never got to the point I had intended. Its
based on radiator surface area and airflow required to get rid of the heat your
engine is generating. The oil cooler is based on the stock Mazda - so
compare your oil cooler surface are to the stock Mazda and adjust by that
ratio. In other words, if you have a stock Mazda you should enter "1" if
your oil cooler surface are is 1.5 times that of the stock then enter
1.5 For the radiator use the frontal area of your radiators, in my
case I have two GM cores each with a 9x10" frontal area (not counting side
tanks), so I input the surface area of one and input 2 radiators of that
size. You could just as easily taken the 90 sq inch and multiplied by 2 =
180 and then input that and "1" radiator. The main thing is to input the
correct frontal area. Clearly this section is based on assumptions
about ducting effectiveness and other system unique variables which are
certainly different in each installation and therefore this section is not
considered as valid as the power section - but, it does give a ball-park
indication.
You
need to input the airspeed and rpm that you want to check cooling at. The
spreadsheet will then check your power figures by selecting the BTU figures at
the rpm you entered in the cooling section - so the power calculations portion
of the spreadsheet must cover the operating conditions (primarily rpm) of your
engine. If you select an rpm in the cooling section that was not generated
in the Power section you will get an "Invalid RPM" message.
The
key factors in the power section are rpm, Air/Fuel Ratio, Manifold pressure and
Temperature. You can change the number of rotors 1,2 or 3 and gearbox
ratio.
No
claim of accuracy is made - just a tool to assist you to get some ball-park
figures on your engine project.