Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.87.139] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 2985625 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:56:32 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: nonEFI fuel systems To: flyrotary X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:56:32 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <007901c3ef46$a1ad8a80$0000a398@Carol> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "sqpilot@earthlink" : Thank you very much for taking the time to answer my many questions....I have a MicroTech EFI computer mostly installed, and the intake manifold and throttlebody are also installed. I was just wondering if I might be better off just "keeping it simple". My MicroTech would take care of the ignition, I just wouldn't have to hook up all the extra wiring, such as throttle position sensor, air temp sensor, injectors, fuel pump relay, etc. Also, I wouldn't have to have fuel return from the fuel rail back to the sump and to the main tanks, nor worry about my high pressure fuel pump failing, or high pressure lines leaking. The down side, of course is that I would have to provide for mixture control and carb heat. I'm not too concerned with the fuel burn....I'll already be saving a lot of money by using auto fuel instead of the expensive 100LL, and my plane has BIG fuel tanks....bigger than my bladder, at least. Thanks again for sharing your experience with a carb. Paul Conner, Mobile, AL