Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.202.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2977866 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 21:06:53 -0500 Received: from 204.127.205.144 ([204.127.205.144]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004020602065301600f4uahe>; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 02:06:53 +0000 Received: from [68.51.45.250] by 204.127.205.144; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 02:06:52 +0000 From: kenpowell@comcast.net To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: water pump with 2 outlets Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 02:06:52 +0000 Message-Id: <020620040206.12602.778@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 27 2003) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VucG93ZWxsQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 I keep looking at all the successful, flying rotary engine airplanes that are using evaporator cores and can't help but wonder if this is the hot setup. Just for everyones consideration, some Toyota's use a standalone water pump that has 2 outlet ports. These look to be about .7" in diameter but I have not measured the size. I can't help but consider using this pump mounted 'low' and using an adapter like the guys using EWP's are using. These 2 outlets from the water pump can be used to run 2 evaporators cores in parallel without fighting with the uneven flow that most other setups deal with. Advantages are: 1. LOW mounted water pump (what is the flow rating of this pump?) 2. parrallel flow to 2 evaporator cores 3. more even coolant distribution to the cores Thanks, Ken Powell