Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.163.54] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0.1)
  with HTTP id 1881814 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:28:55 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Hartzell prop user?
To: flyrotary
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0.1
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:28:55 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1881814@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <a05111b06b9ff6a92ef3a@[65.239.57.65]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Ken Welter <rotary.coot@verizon.net>:

>Never EVER use any kind of metal prop on a pusher.  They don't have the
>fatigue resistance that wood and composite props have, so they cannot

     A coot is a different bird but everyone that has tried a wood prop 
on a coot has disintegrated it and the Hartzells have had no problem and they 
seem to work fine on Seabee's and Lake's also however I am not a fan of the 
Hartzell due to the weight.
   Ken