X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.79] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with SMTP id 5021454 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:28:07 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.91.79; envelope-from=dwayneparkinson@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.91.70] by nm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 18:27:31 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.53] by tm10.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 18:27:31 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1053.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 18:27:31 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 661680.30519.bm@omp1053.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 6102 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Jun 2011 18:27:31 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1308162451; bh=NPzmyauWOXBGP/PcYVeiEJmYzaGWoZt5xan1eVESO6c=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YfILM2m8D2DR8/SSPya3gnGfq+d2DyzbAulptpqeZOuU6PYqxzx826ENywyznSxDPyZryTLvbVhmySjyguG7KKxnynzosBX7udq/lRp1JSdFo4bUhRla3nshqupxcR4hBHfgfPbrr1k5KhMw5Ku0hpCPRR/DY+9gOBRZ87Sx6QM= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cuV4QeiofAJXGENCzMOfo9SYO7QhbJSE7oaWEPQAOuZSfs955nIR2ZFI9xEYzntiBu1yvUHX9jXYcDLYoM4IeVzV1DAjQaV9DT8Kg761u4ppjhZqvCJQezISWaW3rXMX3P1nnOheePZYR8T5RF534qEli6LPyFJBaLUFSfxQugY=; Message-ID: <451430.6068.qm@web46403.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 81.XPb0VM1lVRLQw0LS5_Dz1aRJi1MLj8qsbtdPiULamKtB k2IOsdCfrttn4GGYBU0ZEB9gke4bzcKl3ULpZqcUWpU9eXgO67zGForZFXxd WwGinNfiim.k2Xg.a9H4MhVNZZ1v8GAHwpPB4G04zavCeG6ObEGPJak3Aj34 FsYzmSthdoLpMEvWBoHDUWZx7AfJJNFLziAgML3vsyZf9Um13auCEnzwtbwC eO.p7DhJBFKQu8W9G09uEWP.ftq_5_gzVf1vcH2Hr882xKquZoEocy9KBYrm P9f5X0kR2vJiDVyMsd92ikuEnJ17OdaMVt9kgkra4aGFnwIzdPMBohuYOdkE ubLSnytayd1BGQmpGlTptY6VktXvXRQqE.k.6x9pybtbWng-- Received: from [24.177.130.10] by web46403.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:27:31 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.304355 References: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:27:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Dwayne Parkinson Reply-To: Dwayne Parkinson Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral G-300 vs Lycoming IO-540 To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1715017313-1308162451=:6068" --0-1715017313-1308162451=:6068 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For what it's worth, the IO-540 pictured includes all of the "cooling syste= ms" so it's not quite a straight forward comparison, but pretty nifty none = the less.=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Ed Anderson <= eanderson@carolina.rr.com>=0ATo: Rotary motors in aircraft =0ASent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 8:07 AM=0ASubject: [FlyRotary] = Re: Mistral G-300 vs Lycoming IO-540=0A=0A=0AHey, we knew that Mark,=C2=A0 = I mean - how can you =0Aundertake a roll-your-own engine conversion project= without being an eternal =0Aoptimist {:>)??=0A=0ABut, I hope you are right= - they were so =0Aclose.=0A=C2=A0=0AEd=0A=0A=0AFrom: Mark Steitle =0ASent:= Sunday, June 12, 2011 8:28 AM=0ATo: Rotary motors in aircraft =0ASubject: = [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral G-300 vs Lycoming =0AIO-540=0ABeing the eternal opt= imist, I believe that someone with a fat =0Awallet will come along and carr= y Mistral's torch across the finish line. =0A=C2=A0They were too close to g= ive it all up for good. =0A=0AMark S.=0A=0A=0AOn Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:22= PM, wrjjrs@aol.com wrote:=0A=0A=0A>No Bill,=0A>The =0A M= istral PSRU was a all new straight cut spur gear unit. Considerably tougher= =0A than the Slausen unit.=0A>Bill Jepson =0A>Connected by DROID on Veriz= on Wireless=0A>=0A>-----Original message-----=0A>=0A>From: Bill Bradburry = =0A>>To: Rotary motors in aircraft =0A>>=0A>>Sent: Sat, Jun 11, 2011 16:50:06 GMT+00:00=0A>>S= ubject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral G-300 vs Lycoming IO-540=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>I w= as under the understanding that the Mistral engine had an SAE 2 prop hub.= =C2=A0 The hubs are certainly not the same on these two engines!!??=0A>>= =C2=A0=0A>>The ratio is the same, but is the Mistral PSRU based on the sam= e gear set as Tracy=E2=80=99s PSRU?=0A>>=C2=A0=0A>>Bill B=0A>>=0A>>______= __________________________=0A>> =0A>>From:Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto= :flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Kelly Troyer=0A>>Sent: Saturday,= June 11, 2011 10:59 AM=0A>>To: Rotary motors in aircraft=0A>>Subject: [F= lyRotary] Mistral G-300 vs Lycoming IO-540=0A>>=C2=A0=0A>>Group,=0A>>=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0 Interesting comparison of packaging between=C2=A0the Mistral = G-300 (Cosmo 20B, 3 Rotor to us) and the=0A>>Lycoming IO-540 engines.....= ......=C2=A0=0A>>=C2=A0=0A>>=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=0A>>=C2=A0=0A>>Kelly Troyer= =0A>>"DYKE DELTA JD2" (Eventually)=0A>>"13B ROTARY"_ Engine=0A>>"RWS"_RD1= C/EC2/EM2=0A>>"MISTRAL"_Backplate/Oil =0A Manifold=0A>>"TURBONETICS"_TO4= E50 Turbo --0-1715017313-1308162451=:6068 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For what it's worth, = the IO-540 pictured includes all of the "cooling systems" so it's not quite= a straight forward comparison, but pretty nifty none the less.


From:= Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrot= ary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 8:07 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral G-300 vs Lycoming IO-540
=0A
=0A=0A =0A =0A=0A=0A =0A
Hey, we knew that Mark,  I mean - how can you =0Aunde= rtake a roll-your-own engine conversion project without being an eternal = =0Aoptimist {:>)??
=0A
But, I h= ope you are right - they were so =0Aclose.
=0A
 
=0A
Ed
= =0A
=0A

=0A
=0A=0A
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 8:28 AM=
=0A
To: Rotary motors in aircraft =0A
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral G-300 vs Lycoming =0AIO-= 540
=0A

Being the eternal optimist, I believ= e that someone with a fat =0Awallet will come along and carry Mistral's tor= ch across the finish line. =0A They were too close to give it all up f= or good. =0A

=0A
Mark S.

=0A
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:22 PM, wrjjrs@aol.com <wrjjrs@aol.com> wrote:
=0A
=0A
=0A

No Bill,
The =0A Mistral PSRU was a all new stra= ight cut spur gear unit. Considerably tougher =0A than the Slausen unit.Bill Jepson
Connected by DROID on Verizon =0A Wireless


-----Original message-----
=0A =0A
From: Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net&= gt;
To: Rotary motors =0A in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
= =0A

Sent: Sat, Jun 11, 2011 16= :50:06 =0A GMT+00:00
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral G-300 vs= Lycoming =0A IO-540

=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
= I was un= der the =0A understanding that the Mistral engine had an SAE 2 prop hub.=   The hubs =0A are certainly not the same on these two engines!!??<= /span>
=0A
 
=0A
The ratio is= the =0A same, but is the Mistral PSRU based on the same gear set as Tra= cy=E2=80=99s =0A PSRU?
=0A
 = ;
=0A
Bill =0A B
=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
From: =0A Rotary motors in ai= rcraft [mailto:flyrot= ary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf O= f Kelly Troyer
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 10:59 =0A AM
To: Rotary motors in =0A aircraft
Subject: =0A [FlyRotary] Mistral G-= 300 vs Lycoming IO-540
=0A
 
=0A
=0A
=0A <= div>=0A
=0A
Group,
=0A
=0A
 &nb= sp;  =0A Interesting comparison of packaging between the Mistr= al G-300 (Cosmo =0A 20B, 3 Rotor to us) and the
=0A
=0A =
Lycoming IO-540 =0A engines........... 
=0A
=0A =
 
=0A
=0A
  &= nbsp;
 
= =0A
Kelly =0A Troyer<= br>"DYKE =0A DELTA JD2" (Eventually)<= span style=3D"color: black; font-size: 18pt; font-family: Arial; "><= /font>
=0A
"13B ROT= ARY"_ =0A Engine
"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
"MISTRAL"_Backplate/Oil =0A = Manifold
=0A
"TURBONETIC= S"_TO4E50 =0A Turbo

=0A


= --0-1715017313-1308162451=:6068--