X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with ESMTPS id 4982929 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:01:07 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.240.18.37; envelope-from=echristley@att.net X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,366,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="547828929" Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 13 May 2011 13:00:32 -0700 Received: from [10.62.16.125] (ernestc-laptop.hq.netapp.com [10.62.16.125]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id p4DK0VEi028611 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 13:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DCD8DDE.5010805@att.net> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 16:00:30 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@att.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100623) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 100LL in California References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mark Steitle wrote: > Well, if you don't blow yourself up in the process, you will now have > low octane gas for about $4.50/gallon. Then you'll need a method to > transport it to the airport, then pump/pour it into your fuel tanks, > again without blowing yourself up. From a risk-analysis perspective, it > doesn't wash (pun intended). I just don't see the benefit here. It > would almost be easier to fly to Oklahoma whenever I needed fuel for the > airplane. Dang! That hamburger just got a lot more expensive!! > > Mark > > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Ernest Christley > wrote: > > Bill Schertz wrote: > > Charlie is right, you can extract the ethanol with water. Best > practice would be multiple small washings to reduce it to a > negligible level, but octane would suffer. Also, your price of > auto fuel just went up, because you are sending some down the drain. > > Basically there is a partition coefficient for alcohol between > gasoline and water. Each time you add water, x% moves to the water. > > > Thanks, Bill. That chemistry class in college was a LONG time ago > for me. > > So, how long will it be before someone starts selling a system that > allows you to put contaminated gasoline in one end, have it add > water and then centrifugally separate it, let the clean gasoline go > out the other end, and distill the water to reuse it? The ethanol > would drive the distillation, and the left-over could be mailed to > the stupid politicians and lobbiest that keep adulterating our > gasoline. ("Here! You like it so much, you can have it!") > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >