Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #55010
From: Mark Steitle <msteitle@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 100LL in California
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:38:17 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Well, if you don't blow yourself up in the process, you will now have low octane gas for about $4.50/gallon.  Then you'll need a method to transport it to the airport, then pump/pour it into your fuel tanks, again without blowing yourself up.  From a risk-analysis perspective, it doesn't wash (pun intended).  I just don't see the benefit here.  It would almost be easier to fly to Oklahoma whenever I needed fuel for the airplane.

Mark  

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net> wrote:
Bill Schertz wrote:
Charlie is right, you can extract the ethanol with water. Best practice would be multiple small washings to reduce it to a negligible level, but octane would suffer. Also, your price of auto fuel just went up, because you are sending some down the drain.

Basically there is a partition coefficient for alcohol between gasoline and water.  Each time you add water, x% moves to the water.


Thanks, Bill.  That chemistry class in college was a LONG time ago for me.

So, how long will it be before someone starts selling a system that allows you to put contaminated gasoline in one end, have it add water and then centrifugally separate it, let the clean gasoline go out the other end, and distill the water to reuse it?  The ethanol would drive the distillation, and the left-over could be mailed to the stupid politicians and lobbiest that keep adulterating our gasoline.  ("Here!  You like it so much, you can have it!")


--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster