Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.115.11.51; envelope-from=bbradburry@bellsouth.net
From: "Bill Bradburry" <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>
To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-4982756@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-4982756@logan.com>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: 100LL in California
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:44:24 -0400
Message-ID: <D62747E08C2E443E9507B30A7A7ED98F@Desktop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AcwRkksdqyF3jwrjTX+EQ3gsoS+9ZAACsLSA

Greg,

I don't mix my gas.  I want ZERO ethanol in my Legacy tanks.  It may not
melt them, but I will not take a chance with it.

On the drums...I have mounted a couple of drums on a small trailer that I
use to haul gas.  I have run into one station already that will not allow
gas to be pumped into an "unauthorized" container.  I suspect that this will
only get worse.
If you build a rig to haul gas, I suggest you get an "authorized" container
instead of drums like I did.  I may yet have to change.

Bill B

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Greg Ward
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 1:31 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 100LL in California

Checked Nevada, 7 stations all within hours of Northern/southern CA.  I can 
make the one in Stateline in 4 hours, with 3-50 gal drums.  Enough to fly 
for a while, especially if you were to mix it with local gas.  Any ideas on 
a decent mix ratio?
Greg Ward
Lancair N178RG, still in progress.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Whaley" <jwhaley@datacast.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 9:50 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 100LL in California


Interestingly one of the 3 California sources is a Shell ... you might want 
to check with your closest Shell dealer to see what their pumps say and of 
course test the gas yourself ... up here, all Shell stations offer V-Power 
(91 octane) premium with zero ethanol ... it is possible that more of your 
Shell stations do as well but just don't appear on the pure-gas website.
Shell's 87 has 10%, 89 has 5% and 91 has 0% - at least here in Ontario 
Canada.
Jeff

From: "Al Gietzen" <ALVentures@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: 100LL in California
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 07:29:13 -0800
To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

The pure-gas.org lists only 3 sources in all of California.  I've checked 
the local marinas around San Diego, and the response I get is "all fuel in 
CA contains 10 % ethanol".

I've tested the fuel I've been buying at the local Chevron stations, and it 
has 10% ethanol. I've been using that fuel almost exclusively for 5 years in

my Velocity (EZpoxy tanks), and am not aware of any problems sp far.  It 
does cause me some anxiety, however; so I'm considering more extensive use 
of 100LL.

Seems ironic - one good reason for using mogas is eliminating the lead 
pollution; which the regulators are trying to achieve; and then they 
regulate the requirement for ethanol in the fuel which makes that a bad 
choice as well.  Typical bureaucratic lose-lose situation.

Al


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature

database 6116 (20110512) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


This message, and the documents attached hereto, is intended only for the 
addressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. Any 
unauthorized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify us immediately so that we may correct our 
internal records. Please then delete the original message. Thank you.

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: 
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html


--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html