|
I believe that if the oil companies think they have any
chance of winning they will contest it regardless of the economic pay
back. The historically view any such attempt as the first foot in the door
to worst (from their perspective) attempts. Besides, the oil
companies have all of these lawyers that need to show they are worth their
pay {:>) - no offense intended, Chris.
Ed
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 4:50 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: 100LL in California
Ernest,
Good question (I was wondering that myself). I guess we'll have to
wait and see if the oil companies just roll over, or if they'll stand
up and fight.
Mark
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net> wrote:
Mark Steitle wrote:
Bill,
You could be right on that. It surely
won't hurt to put a little pressure on the FAA to find/approve an
alternative aviation fuel. Personally, I would be happy if they would
make premium auto fuel ethanol free. On another note, with the time it
takes for things to work their way through the court system, it will be
years before this gets resolved. The oil companies can afford to hire
the best attorneys.
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|