X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with ESMTPS id 4980859 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:51:36 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.161.52; envelope-from=msteitle@gmail.com Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so658083fxm.25 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:50:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+AIhRUx/PmCWRtInAzZLehU3LS0VJMX/AyQtmdcA2VI=; b=qmTp/T4VSDPB3rxq27S5b+R8moZQpXBNwpUvij/3bE68pYRzAGEWJ24XFc9mLGc7b8 iIrzlKKU4K4e5T+wvVnYFlWt1wCFeWLcjw+kLnaDmbbsc//KoCnr919Vo1HDb1fCrLHR /cv9a/PQkgOb1CmIaQRpKC7czxbsK06Q/RJyo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cr8/QG5bn5RAGMv1I+NQkoavrqRKCkW6RqvcR0hvn8VfbTcT4KHMKuUPwej4cDDrKz 1bu197rG4/hifPPepRP+L3SXeI/7eEP5Bn/O/4QPHBae+M6uWjF/JVX5Ze0X4Up8u5T5 +LzPXd7v0OEdksYuLjlxNNeiRiGjoALeuwwDI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.98.141 with SMTP id q13mr2248506fan.96.1305147058602; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.86.15 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:50:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:50:58 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: 100LL in California From: Mark Steitle To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174fed6ccec48e04a3063a20 --0015174fed6ccec48e04a3063a20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ernest, Good question (I was wondering that myself). I guess we'll have to wait and see if the oil companies just roll over, or if they'll stand up and fight. Mark On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Ernest Christley wrote: > Mark Steitle wrote: > >> Bill, >> You could be right on that. It surely won't hurt to put a little >> pressure on the FAA to find/approve an alternative aviation fuel. >> Personally, I would be happy if they would make premium auto fuel ethanol >> free. On another note, with the time it takes for things to work their way >> through the court system, it will be years before this gets resolved. The >> oil companies can afford to hire the best attorneys. >> >> > Sure, but would they? Will they pay for the attorneys knowing that 100LL > is such low volume and is going to have to go away eventually anyhow? > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > --0015174fed6ccec48e04a3063a20 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ernest,
=A0
Good question (I was wondering that myself).=A0 I guess we'll have= to wait and see if the oil companies just roll over, or if they'll=A0s= tand up=A0and fight.
=A0
Mark

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Ernest Christle= y <echristley@at= t.net> wrote:
Mark Steitle wrote:
Bill,
=A0You could be right o= n that. =A0It surely won't hurt to put a little pressure on the FAA to = find/approve an alternative aviation fuel. =A0Personally, I would be happy = if they would make premium auto fuel ethanol free. =A0On another note, with= the time it takes for things to work their way through the court system, i= t will be years before this gets resolved. =A0The oil companies can afford = to hire the best attorneys.
=A0
Sure, but would they? =A0Will they pay for the at= torneys knowing that 100LL is such low volume and is going to have to go aw= ay eventually anyhow?

--
Homepage: =A0http://www.flyrotary.c= om/
Archive and UnSub: =A0 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists= /flyrotary/List.html

--0015174fed6ccec48e04a3063a20--