Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #54981
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: 100LL in California
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:15:54 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Mark Steitle wrote:
Bill,
 
You could be right on that.  It surely won't hurt to put a little pressure on the FAA to find/approve an alternative aviation fuel.  Personally, I would be happy if they would make premium auto fuel ethanol free.  On another note, with the time it takes for things to work their way through the court system, it will be years before this gets resolved.  The oil companies can afford to hire the best attorneys.
 
Sure, but would they?  Will they pay for the attorneys knowing that 100LL is such low volume and is going to have to go away eventually anyhow?
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster