X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with ESMTPS id 4970875 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 08 May 2011 22:52:56 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.240.18.37; envelope-from=echristley@att.net X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,338,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="546460631" Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 08 May 2011 19:52:19 -0700 Received: from [10.30.28.72] (stautner1-lxp.hq.netapp.com [10.30.28.72] (may be forged)) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id p492qI5w001069 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 19:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DC756E1.4080506@att.net> Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 22:52:17 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@att.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100623) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: I've got fuel pressure References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Steven W. Boese wrote: > Ernest, >=20 > =20 >=20 > It is good that the inconsistencies I noted in your data can be=20 > explained by the limitations of the tests themselves. That makes it=20 > much less likely that there might be problems with the rest of the fuel= =20 > system. I hope that my remarks weren=92t taken as overly critical or=20 > negative. That certainly was not my intent. >=20 Pfft!! If you see an inconsistency, point it out. I probably missed it,= and there'd be a hidden demon somewhere. You=20 guys will forgive me for doing something stupid, and help me figure it ou= t. Mother Nature will bring down The Law=20 According to Newton, and kill me for my stupidity. I will run the tests again later, once I have a better experimental setup= and I have a better handle on the software.=20 I'm curious to know exactly how accurately I can pin down the characteris= tics with this method. One other issue I noticed. The ECU gives a clearing pulse when you turn = it on. The idea is to provide a way to clear=20 the lines in a hot engine bay. I don't think the authors would have igno= red this, but I might not have that feature=20 turned off. I'll have to investigate it further. > =20 >=20 > As you stated, the =93turn on time=94 that you got from the reproducibl= e=20 > tests is very reasonable. It agrees with values I=92ve measured and wi= th=20 > values I=92ve seen reported elsewhere. Demonstrating the good match of= =20 > your injectors is also very useful. >=20 > =20 >=20 > It=92s my opinion that the time and effort you are putting into these=20 > tests is very worthwhile in terms of understanding your system. The=20 > fact that you are having fun doing it is even better. >=20