X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nm1-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([66.94.236.27] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with SMTP id 4964403 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 02 May 2011 14:43:40 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.94.236.27; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net Received: from [66.94.237.126] by nm1.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 18:43:04 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.123] by tm1.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 18:43:04 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1028.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 18:43:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 433858.79783.bm@omp1028.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 57055 invoked from network); 2 May 2011 18:43:04 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s1024; t=1304361784; bh=VG2ZwvOLpFE60tnYDfQ1PzbeO9yOopKp3dsiIZU33NI=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=wZLMNPV87ll1Lqr1oZYqLHzC68Z/zZQcii8O3prOc2QiaME4vek1Rk4q/rvYYabMyHQPjXyITps4N0wbTRhacMBRFthxNy60nOpO/CoMOtrnKpOQ7a9Ft6eKwT9K5tTmSuYCc7ZU59EQd1byukCcRcclMKOiiOoSkW68/Njwq2E= Received: from [192.168.10.8] (ceengland@98.95.171.78 with plain) by smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 02 May 2011 11:43:03 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: uXJ_6LOswBCr8InijhYErvjWlJuRkoKPGNeiuu7PA.5wcGoy X-YMail-OSG: QI.9V3wVM1mCJCYSeoIm_pdi824Cmw4RAGn8Czbtx0wSiR9 2.cXpuBDYTRoqqtQOHdsW6iQnd3lvHjZyXDMNuhZij1QITVJx2.ck5lpTTjk ue4Jvovjor4DYRdIdCuRQf5207LvFunYa2I21zg1DuYBAHjMeHlKtJ4fDBfH cOLRPol3tGWpuPvxvMaqvGVviNPJrf5rN49UNI197wdYGNwAK3CcXFTLV5iY khKDtORzVbyxTz0Dzj.FBzwN7FNXWz_8KFnj_TkA89RKa1MMH9j8TZ3b.Bfl RcecXw.6lYDdbhqIHPJ3jMWwqqcRYUPOIXxWYw6DwEgtrkLf4ZoH.nIxFVoh jJXoQxuAIHMgR4tOqAZAy0w-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4DBEFB37.2070905@bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 13:43:03 -0500 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: hung. (the Renesis, that is...) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050501090108050207080102" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050501090108050207080102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Where were your pics while I was doing my design work? :-) I just assumed that since I couldn't use the whole dynafocal ring, I needed to remove all of it. How about pics of what you did for the top? Also, weights? Your lower adapters are certainly lighter than mine; I went max overkill with 1/8" 4130. My bushings are hot rod shop 'shackle bushings'; stiffer than dyna's, but ~$8 each. My firewall side weighs exactly the same as the stock dynafocal; the 3 adapter plates & top tube V assembly weigh a total of ~7 lbs. Anyone have a total weight for the most common 'bottom plate' mount for an RV-x (meaning all the 'stuff' from firewall bolts forward to hang the engine)? Charlie On 5/2/2011 9:47 AM, stevei@carey.asn.au wrote: > #3 > > On 02/05/2011, at 9:27 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote: > >> That is a totally new motor mount concept! I have not seen that >> before?? Aircraft cowlings are designed for aircraft engines...I can >> guarantee you will have trouble finding room for everything you put >> under there! :>) >> >> Bill B >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:*Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] >> *On Behalf Of *Charlie England >> *Sent:* Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:54 PM >> *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft >> *Subject:* [FlyRotary] hung. (the Renesis, that is...) >> >> Well, it's now dangling in front of the firewall. >> >> Several better pics didn't make it from the camera to the computer >> hard drive, but at least you can see the general idea in this pic. >> I'm hoping that I'll have room for coolers, intake, exhaust, etc. >> >> Charlie >> > --------------050501090108050207080102 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Where were your pics while I was doing my design work? :-)

I just assumed that since I couldn't use the whole dynafocal ring, I needed to remove all of it.

How about pics of what you did for the top?

Also, weights? Your lower adapters are certainly lighter than mine; I went max overkill with 1/8" 4130.

My bushings are hot rod shop 'shackle bushings'; stiffer than dyna's, but ~$8 each.

My firewall side weighs exactly the same as the stock dynafocal; the 3 adapter plates & top tube V assembly weigh a total of ~7 lbs.

Anyone have a total weight for the most common 'bottom plate' mount for an RV-x (meaning all the 'stuff' from firewall bolts forward to hang the engine)?

Charlie

On 5/2/2011 9:47 AM, stevei@carey.asn.au wrote:
#3

On 02/05/2011, at 9:27 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote:

That is a totally new motor mount concept!  I have not seen that before??  Aircraft cowlings are designed for aircraft engines…I can guarantee you will have trouble finding room for everything you put under there!  :>)

 

Bill B

 

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Charlie England
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:54 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] hung. (the Renesis, that is...)

 

Well, it's now dangling in front of the firewall.

Several better pics didn't make it from the camera to the computer hard drive, but at least you can see the general idea in this pic. I'm hoping that I'll have room for coolers, intake, exhaust, etc.

Charlie



--------------050501090108050207080102--