X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <SBoese@uwyo.edu> Received: from willowsprings.uwyo.edu ([129.72.10.31] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2o) with ESMTPS id 4884593 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:19:12 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=129.72.10.31; envelope-from=SBoese@uwyo.edu Received: from ponyexpress-ht1.uwyo.edu (ponyexpress-ht1.uwyo.edu [10.84.60.208]) by willowsprings.uwyo.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1S1IWKC012103 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:18:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from SBoese@uwyo.edu) Received: from ponyexpress-mb5.uwyo.edu ([fe80::9813:248c:2d68:a28b]) by ponyexpress-ht1 ([10.84.60.208]) with mapi; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:18:32 -0700 From: "Steven W. Boese" <SBoese@uwyo.edu> To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:18:19 -0700 Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2/ Tracy Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2/ Tracy Thread-Index: AcvWxDrAOiEwylr/S+i4up/+4a8xqwAGO0Aw Message-ID: <E1AA3B1AF41D8049B1E3FBD5E225626008872D236B@ponyexpress-mb5.uwyo.edu> References: <list-4884443@logan.com> In-Reply-To: <list-4884443@logan.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E1AA3B1AF41D8049B1E3FBD5E225626008872D236Bponyexpressmb_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_E1AA3B1AF41D8049B1E3FBD5E225626008872D236Bponyexpressmb_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brian, If mode 4 is at the default setting and the engine ran smoothly on just the= secondary injectors when using the backup procedure, it seems unlikely tha= t there is a significant difference in flow rate between those secondary in= jectors. It might be useful to set modes 1, 4, and 6 back to factory defaults and se= t mode 3 at a MAP just below the staging threshold. The reason for this su= ggestion is because when MAP becomes higher than the staging threshold, the= re is the effect of the mixture going lean due to injector lag. There is a= lso the effect of the mixture going rich due to bringing on the larger flow= rate secondary injectors. It just so happens that with 28 lb primaries an= d 40 lb secondaries, these two effects very nearly cancel each other out if= the engine is running in the neighborhood of 4000 RPM and using about 6 ga= l/hr. With a default table and higher fuel flow rates than 6 gal/hr, the i= njector lag effect will gradually tend to make the mixture richer. The exc= ess fuel flow rate will be about 10% by the time a flow rate of around 14 g= al/hr is reached. This richening tendency can then be compensated for usin= g mode 1 or 9. No guarantees, but it may be worth a try. Do you happen to know at what RPM staging occurs on the ground and in fligh= t? Do you also know the fuel flow rates under those two conditions? Steve Boese From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Beh= alf Of bktrub@aol.com Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 2:20 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2/ Tracy No, I don't have a secondary injector failure as far as I know. Several poi= nts- I had the injectors cleaned and flow tested. Primaries are 28 #, secon= daries 40#- the engine is a 13bREW- 93 twin turbo, but normally aspirated. I checked to see if all= the injectors were firing by disconnecting all the other leads and running= on mode 1, engine off and press program switch. They all are firing. Also = ran the injector backup proceedure. The engine runs well on the ground all through the power band, but in the a= ir , after staging it is a bit rough and misses. My theory- the secondaries= are not firing equally and need to be tuned in mode 4. The engine stages n= ormally at MAP address 84, and transistions through that point pretty smoot= hly, and runs very smooth below that point. That's why I think I need a bit= of rotor matching in mode 4 above the staging point using the EGTs. I feel that I am making definate progress. Brian Trubee --_000_E1AA3B1AF41D8049B1E3FBD5E225626008872D236Bponyexpressmb_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:= //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content= =3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Micros= oft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><style><!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Cambria; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} h2 {mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-link:"Heading 2 Char"; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; font-size:18.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} span.Heading2Char {mso-style-name:"Heading 2 Char"; mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-link:"Heading 2"; font-family:"Cambria","serif"; color:#4F81BD; font-weight:bold;} p.msochpdefault, li.msochpdefault, div.msochpdefault {mso-style-name:msochpdefault; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} span.heading2char0 {mso-style-name:heading2char;} span.emailstyle18 {mso-style-name:emailstyle18;} span.EmailStyle21 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;} span.EmailStyle22 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only;} @page WordSection1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit"> <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-US link=3D"#000000= " vlink=3D"#000000"><div class=3DWordSection1><p class=3DMsoNormal><span st= yle=3D'font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>Brian,<o:p></o:p></spa= n></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";= color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style= =3D'font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>If mode 4 is at the defau= lt setting and the engine ran smoothly on just the secondary injectors when= using the backup procedure, it seems unlikely that there is a significant = difference in flow rate between those secondary injectors.<o:p></o:p></span= ></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";c= olor:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D= 'font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>It might be useful to set mo= des 1, 4, and 6 back to factory defaults and set mode 3 at a MAP just below= the staging threshold. The reason for this suggestion is because whe= n MAP becomes higher than the staging threshold, there is the effect of the= mixture going lean due to injector lag. There is also the effect of = the mixture going rich due to bringing on the larger flow rate secondary in= jectors. It just so happens that with 28 lb primaries and 40 lb secon= daries, these two effects very nearly cancel each other out if the engine i= s running in the neighborhood of 4000 RPM and using about 6 gal/hr. W= ith a default table and higher fuel flow rates than 6 gal/hr, the injector = lag effect will gradually tend to make the mixture richer. The excess= fuel flow rate will be about 10% by the time a flow rate of around 14 gal/= hr is reached. This richening tendency can then be compensated for us= ing mode 1 or 9. No guarantees, but it may be worth a try. <o:p= ></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-family:"Arial","= sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><= span style=3D'font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>Do you happen t= o know at what RPM staging occurs on the ground and in flight? = Do you also know the fuel flow rates under those two conditions? <o:p= ></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-family:"Arial","= sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><= span style=3D'font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>Steve Boese&nbs= p; <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-fam= ily:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class= =3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-se= rif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style=3D'border:none;b= order-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=3DMsoNorm= al><b><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>Fr= om:</span></b><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-se= rif"'> Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] <b>On= Behalf Of </b>bktrub@aol.com<br><b>Sent:</b> Sunday, February 27, 2011 2:2= 0 PM<br><b>To:</b> Rotary motors in aircraft<br><b>Subject:</b> [FlyRotary]= Re: EC2/ Tracy<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> = </o:p></p><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-fa= mily:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>No, I don't have a secondary injecto= r failure as far as I know. Several points- I had the injectors cleaned and= flow tested. Primaries are 28 #, secondaries 40#- the engine<o:p></o:p></s= pan></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;fon= t-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>is a 13bREW- 93 twin turbo, but = normally aspirated. I checked to see if all the injectors were firing by di= sconnecting all the other leads and running on mode 1, engine off and press= program switch. They all are firing. Also ran the injector backup pro= ceedure. <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style= =3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'> <o= :p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-siz= e:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>The engine runs well= on the ground all through the power band, but in the air , after staging i= t is a bit rough and misses. My theory- the secondaries are not firing equa= lly and need to be tuned in mode 4. The engine stages normally at MAP addre= ss 84, and transistions through that point pretty smoothly, and runs very s= mooth below that point. That's why I think I need a bit of rotor matching i= n mode 4 above the staging point using the EGTs.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div= ><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Ari= al","sans-serif";color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p cla= ss=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-se= rif";color:black'>I feel that I am making definate progress.<o:p></o:p></sp= an></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font= -family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div= ><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Ari= al","sans-serif";color:black'>Brian Trubee<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div>= <div id=3D"AOLMsgPart_2_22f81d95-4902-4d6a-a700-9d414217c3a0"><p class=3DMs= oNormal><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";co= lor:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></body></html>= --_000_E1AA3B1AF41D8049B1E3FBD5E225626008872D236Bponyexpressmb_--