X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from willowsprings.uwyo.edu ([129.72.10.31] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2o) with ESMTPS id 4884265 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:49:36 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=129.72.10.31; envelope-from=SBoese@uwyo.edu Received: from ponyexpress-ht2.uwyo.edu (ponyexpress-ht2.uwyo.edu [10.84.60.209]) by willowsprings.uwyo.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1RGmvaN010660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:48:58 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from SBoese@uwyo.edu) Received: from ponyexpress-mb5.uwyo.edu ([fe80::9813:248c:2d68:a28b]) by ponyexpress-ht2 ([10.84.60.209]) with mapi; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:48:56 -0700 From: "Steven W. Boese" To: Rotary motors in aircraft Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:48:51 -0700 Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2/ Tracy Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2/ Tracy Thread-Index: AcvWkGDRP0lDXhc9SficLPYwSZwlfQADWA/g Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E1AA3B1AF41D8049B1E3FBD5E225626008872D2348ponyexpressmb_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_E1AA3B1AF41D8049B1E3FBD5E225626008872D2348ponyexpressmb_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The same thing can be accomplished without removing and exchanging the inje= ctors by using the injector backup procedure. Steve Boese From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Beh= alf Of stevei@carey.asn.au Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 8:09 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2/ Tracy Hi Brian You don't have a secondary injector failure do you? If your Pri and Sec injectors are the same, how about swapping them and run= on the secondaries under the staging point and see if she is smooth, thus = confirming the Secondaries are OK. Otherwise if you can run her up on the ground above the staging point and d= isconnect one sec and then the other, you'll be able to confirm the Sec's a= re OK. So if after disconnecting a secondary there is no change, that injector is = Duff. With the other one if she goes smooth, it would suggest the other Sec= is Duff. Just a thought. Steve Izett On 27/02/2011, at 7:28 AM, > > wrote: --_000_E1AA3B1AF41D8049B1E3FBD5E225626008872D2348ponyexpressmb_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The same t= hing can be accomplished without removing and exchanging the injectors by u= sing the injector backup procedure.

 =

Steve Boese

 

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Beha= lf Of stevei@carey.asn.au
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 8:0= 9 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary]= Re: EC2/ Tracy

=  

Hi Brian

 

You don't= have a secondary injector failure do you?

If your Pri and Sec injectors are the same, how about swappin= g them and run on the secondaries under the staging point and see if she is= smooth, thus confirming the Secondaries are OK.

<= p class=3DMsoNormal>Otherwise if you can run her up on the ground above the= staging point and disconnect one sec and then the other, you'll be able to= confirm the Sec's are OK. 

So if after disconnecting a secondary there is no change, that injector= is Duff. With the other one if she goes smooth, it would suggest the other= Sec is Duff.

Just a thought.=

 

<= div>

Steve Izett

On 27/02/2011, at 7:28 AM, <bkt= rub@aol.com> <bktrub@aol.com> wrote:

&nbs= p;

= --_000_E1AA3B1AF41D8049B1E3FBD5E225626008872D2348ponyexpressmb_--