X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from outbound-b1.mx-route.com ([208.123.79.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2a) with ESMTP id 4839511 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:02:18 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=208.123.79.45; envelope-from=tom@midwestaviation.net Received: from fl-184-0-224-156.dhcp.centurylinkservices.net (HELO [192.168.1.66]) ([184.0.224.156]) by smtp.mxtoolbox.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 05 Feb 2011 17:01:43 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] EGT From: Thomas Giddings In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 18:01:42 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Steve: What are the performance numbers so far compared to the Standard = motor Tom Giddings(New Guy) Building Questair Venture Considering Turbo Normailzed 20B C/S Prop On Feb 5, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Steve Thomas wrote: > Since we are on the subject, what do you-all consider to be "normal" = EGT values for a redline? >=20 > Best Regards, >=20 > Steve Thomas >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________________ >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html