Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #5365
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake question
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:36:43 -0600
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Actually, Rusty, the secondary ports on the NA block and the turbo block are different.  In fact, when I saw the amount of gasket it reminded me of the amount I see when I try a NA manifold against a turbo block.  Secondaries on the NA and Turbo are different. 
 
 Ed Anderson 
 
I called up Atkins, and they said they never made a straight manifold for the turbo block, though they did make one for an "early 4 port".  I think they're referring to something like the 84-85 13B in the RX-7, but I'm not sure.  They also made a straight manifold for the 6 port, which must be what I have.  Silly me, I actually expected the 6 port manifold to have 6 ports, like the engine does.  
 
Next time I go to the hanger, you can bet that I'll be measuring some manifolds.  I'm now wondering if the one I was using previously had the proper size ports.  Ignorance is bliss :-)
 
I'm still not sure what I'll do.  The manifold would certainly run like this, but it would never be right.  At the moment, I'd like to get done with this &*#$@ fiberglass oil cooler scoop.  At least it's far better looking than BUC.
 
Cheers,
Rusty (who as you know, hates fiberglass) 


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster