X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nm14-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.246] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2a) with SMTP id 4822310 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:59:09 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.91.246; envelope-from=dwayneparkinson@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.91.64] by nm14.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Jan 2011 23:58:35 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.9] by tm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Jan 2011 23:58:35 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1009.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Jan 2011 23:58:35 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 493742.3339.bm@omp1009.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 7430 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Jan 2011 23:58:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1295654315; bh=TNNpSEC2VtFcNGIxD2HXrSlgh58B2wuFKYuANWhL4/s=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=40BulvgCSXeVdFt8aNiqub+JitbAghhTlK1xR9qJ/6aXdiLYPEPJJ8z9LmGiB2eqxv6e3XfP84IH4z0wUMn0ero++62NYFQ6a7SFAr6w9PzvfHYzMjYEP9RwoiU8tNfA0jKfNRG1AmmrlhfHS6KWJ0tx5DxI8D8FTEWOgWGZprI= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FQIogBMfEBiJ19fi99aGQDGCSOLq4ayVm7QRk5kjBWGQ2BVkbcAtwVelmKSGOI8HMp8nDg64gY5x+lPv5hJ1UkFCb+5TtQFTd8Es8jfAaj2stqZoRyKDpeHbYuz9BE5phwRFotYLWwhEFOyF4KZv2VRDeuUD+6S7zHYeA5l7d+w=; Message-ID: <326225.6292.qm@web46409.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: NjS05T4VM1kj0TLK33QrRJXUCihLfRJf1Pe_9sQ5j6qO0tB mKhh2E38Zffd6An1zP5URR2eEeclEivuSKWKdNPk2r8K3ASysh7xcegWzluK 6laDRgoeAlkvmutsJMnt8TKllPh3xjFSZqU3bvD50NwwyGZev8bytRFDVSgl 13VfJqqzEIuKc1QdHuswN4IXtTRzOCq9mUyCLljvVwzjMYqLRVY.isEIsOQU QTRnZfhfby4YunJYPf0qMswgzaRa_D0Wc.S_RaReDMfhyUz7DanczkVydv1o CQro- Received: from [24.177.130.10] by web46409.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:58:35 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/555 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:58:35 -0800 (PST) From: Dwayne Parkinson Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Supercharged Rotary To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1260658033-1295654315=:6292" --0-1260658033-1295654315=:6292 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I didn't see a reply to this so I'll take a shot. YES. There's at least one super charged rotary installation. I believe it's somewhere in Texas. You may also be interested in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06yxb5-HvxA Happy building / flying ________________________________ From: Dustin Lobner To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Sun, January 9, 2011 4:21:08 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Supercharged Rotary Hi everyone, If going with an intake boosting system, everything I've heard so far is for using turbos. Has anyone ever used a supercharger? I can't help but think that a supercharger would be a) more rugged b) easier/simpler to install and c) lighter weight (for the whole install) compared to a turbo. I also know that your efficiency is going to be down compared to a turbo. What I was thinking was using something like this: http://www.procharger.com/pdf/C-1.pdf <--- beware it's a 3MB file. Thoughts? Dustin Rockford, IL --0-1260658033-1295654315=:6292 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
I didn't see a reply to this so I'll take a shot.  YES.  There's at least one super charged rotary installation.  I believe it's somewhere in Texas.

You may also be interested in this 


Happy building / flying


From: Dustin Lobner <dmlobner@gmail.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sun, January 9, 2011 4:21:08 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Supercharged Rotary

Hi everyone,

If going with an intake boosting system, everything I've heard so far is for using turbos.  Has anyone ever used a supercharger?  I can't help but think that a supercharger would be a) more rugged b) easier/simpler to install and c) lighter weight (for the whole install) compared to a turbo.  I also know that your efficiency is going to be down compared to a turbo. 

What I was thinking was using something like this:  http://www.procharger.com/pdf/C-1.pdf  <--- beware it's a 3MB file.

Thoughts?

Dustin
Rockford, IL

--0-1260658033-1295654315=:6292--