X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-iw0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.11) with ESMTPS id 4675426 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:49:39 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.214.180; envelope-from=david.staten@gmail.com Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so3494157iwn.25 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:49:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=psvaMctwHATlg7acG0vPDMO/w1Eed6grusnro8PmyBo=; b=g3OYZEe4RfNDPdj6ePfIcD0opUGL7hAgHGau4ZuC4KgGOaVeuzG9WDByn/L58JwfzL YO6n0/YpQO0/a72KSzPfIFvQfoqc95eG3PIy/4MWwyQqlEPJ7+Yi9XUc1UINtw0EfWd5 5yvb04l03uohZou1Vu75O6vVgFpot9NzUgh9k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vp51dQt2uKMgQ9RLQpJRXeBW10Pl0s+VRzJTeL+g70wxYkEdhznB3KZkgHHPYcgj5J TAAlWJiEhKbbP7xLYg6DVOsRvl9SG2wmfyj1HdC+TEvzfS/P8+RGlDA4ahy2sgEGXeaM DNfvoHY9LjSlftoRbX0GXV26pCNRHrDosj8sQ= Received: by 10.231.199.12 with SMTP id eq12mr1542722ibb.2.1295063343613; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:49:03 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([216.80.142.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gy41sm1520304ibb.23.2011.01.14.19.49.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:49:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D311935.6060403@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:49:09 -0600 From: Dave User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Question for Lynn... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit We made a spacer as well for Chris's first engine, I'm sure thats been carried over to the replacement engines. Dave On 1/14/2011 6:57 PM, Ben Schneider wrote: > Doug, > > I don't know if it was me you read about, but I made a spacer to put the pick up tube back down to the bottom of the pan, both to pick up the oil as designed, and to support the pick up tube. Otherwise, it would not clear the plate of the mount, and it would be 1/2" off the bottom of the pan, unsupported. > > I guess I don't know if it was necessary from an oil stand point, but it was necessary to get the engine on the plate. > > If it was someone else you read about (and there are most likely others that have done it) then disregard all the above. ;) > > Ben > > --- On Fri, 1/14/11, dlomheim@aol.com wrote: > >> From: dlomheim@aol.com >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Question for Lynn... >> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" >> Date: Friday, January 14, 2011, 3:39 PM >> Hey Lynn; I recently read that one >> builder had an insert machined to be added to his oil pickup >> tube to take up the space created by using a bed type mount >> sandwhiched between the pan and block. My question is: >> is this really necessary? Thanks for your insights as >> always! Doug >> Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >