X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.11) with SMTP id 4672893 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:19:23 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=69.89.21.8; envelope-from=jslade@canardaviation.com Received: (qmail 24771 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2011 04:18:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host296.hostmonster.com) (66.147.240.96) by oproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 04:18:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=canardaviation.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=RebUUfx2rnH6oUMfVo3Shur0/l5VtOLkVezI8nfP08yu8XPvOwM15x62597FabFPynhyXiC4oVPjJya47eJC2kr02TP4imoFRRNZfDeW/1ggyXmnV/2URpghgoleqJ6e; Received: from c-174-61-10-12.hsd1.fl.comcast.net ([174.61.10.12] helo=[192.168.1.4]) by host296.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdEe7-0001Hr-0w for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:18:47 -0700 Message-ID: <4D2E7D33.5010803@canardaviation.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:18:59 -0500 From: John Slade Reply-To: jslade@canardaviation.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Apex seals and MAP table corruption? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040506080706060109070101" X-Identified-User: {3339:host296.hostmonster.com:instanu1:canardaviation.com} {sentby:smtp auth 174.61.10.12 authed with jslade+canardaviation.com} This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040506080706060109070101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/12/2011 9:45 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote: > Those of you who have had your MAP table corrupted, was a switch > between CPUs and or coil testing involved prior to the problem? Not in my case. A just started running very rough. I switched to B. A was corrupted. Happened a few times without anything else being switched. I returned the unit to Tracy. Not sure what he did, but I never had corruption with the unit again after he returned it. --------------040506080706060109070101 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/12/2011 9:45 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote:
Those of you who have had your MAP table corrupted, was a switch between CPUs and or coil testing involved prior to the problem? 
Not in my case. A just started running very rough. I switched to B. A was corrupted. Happened a few times without anything else being switched. I returned the unit to Tracy. Not sure what he did, but I never had corruption with the unit again after he returned it.
--------------040506080706060109070101--