Sorry Bill, I just reread what I wrote a second ago, and it may have come off as rude. That was not my intent, intended a bit of humor. Sorry if it was taken wrong.

  Reason I posted this was from the Alternative engine fly in this weekend in Paducah KY. Sam had a problem with low RPM, and it was immediately remedied with a different prop (but labeled the same dimensions) After running, and a side by side comparison, obvious that the first was a misbuild? mislabel? not sure, but not correct. I have a prop from the same builder, and was wondering about it. Thus, I checked and reported.

Ben

--- On Sun, 9/26/10, Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> From: Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop Diameter.
> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Date: Sunday, September 26, 2010, 5:56 PM
> Ben, What static rpm are you getting
> with your prop?
>
> Bill B
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
> On
> Behalf Of Ben Schneider
> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 6:28 PM
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Prop Diameter.
>
> Sam and Doug,
>
>    I checked my prop this morning. Made it
> in at 12:45am, so I decided to
> shower and go to bed. Prop measures the right diameter, of
> course I have no
> idea if the cord is appropriate for the HP. It is a 66 x 85
> three blade;
> compared to the C130 prop on Sams airplane, it looks pretty
> small.
>
> Had a great time Saturday, great to see everyone. Thanks
> Sam for the
> motivation, I have made some good progress today.
>
>  Best,
>
> Ben
>
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:
> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>
>
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>