Return-Path: Received: from imo-m08.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.163] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2925028 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:28:18 -0500 Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r4.8.) id q.e4.445335fb (657) for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:28:06 -0500 (EST) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:28:05 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: expansion tank To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 << In my opinion, the port near the top of the pump won't be high enough to be > effective for removing air. Just leave it plugged. Better an outlet on top of > the "water out" fitting that bolts to the top of the pump. The port at the > bottom of the water inlet will work for the return line from the heater. > >Hi, Lynn....thanks so much for taking the time to explain the cooling system. When I purchased my custom radiator from C&R Racing, the person I spoke to in the engineering section said that I should use this port to send water/antifreeze to the side inlet of my expansion tank. He said that I need to use a connection point such as this, as there is always water circulating, and it is beneath the thermostat. If I made an inlet higher up, which would be above the thermostat, I'm thinking that wouldn't work as well? He said that I could attach a hose to the bottom of my expansion tank and connect to the lower hose section where my heater core fluid returns. Does this sound correct to you? Thanks again for your time and information. I guess I haven't totally grasped this yet. P.S. The only radiator cap I will have is on the top of my expansion tank. I will fill the system by removing the upper radiator hose, then fill the expansion tank, run the engine, repeat, etc? Thanks again. Paul Conner That would be mixing features of two different systems. Both work fine, and probably mixing some of the elements together would work fine. The V-8 people tend to run hoses from the back of cylinder heads, and many other places, to the make up tank. We race in GT-3 and the GT-1 cars are the astounding TransAm cars with 600 HP V-8s. They have every gag there is working on the cooling system, but a common theme is the top water bleed idea. To work, the tank has to be hooked up to the low pressure side of the pump or nothing will flow toward the tank. That way anyplace that seems to build up steam because of poor coolant circulation can be scavenged, and the steam pocket problem is cured. I just reviewed the idea in Carroll Smith's "Prepare to Win." If you drop back a few feet and look at the top water bleed systems, one thing stands out to me. The little tank is being used as a swirl pot. In theory, coolant from higher pressure hot spot areas, is forced into the side of the lower pressure tank. The tank is kept full to some level, so once in a while, a burp of steam, or just air bubbles will show up in the tank and pop to the top. Circulation will continue with coolant leaving the bottom of the tank to replace the volume of bubbles. You would want to chase this system, by letting it cool down and checking water level in the tank a number of heat cycles until most of the air is removed from the cooling system. I wood keep the tank a bit over half full to have any system pressure available to drive coolant into the low pressure side of the pump with speed changes. The disadvantage of this layout, is that the top water lines must be at the very top of the tank so as not to entrain additional air in the coolant as it returns to the tank. Remember there is constant circulation. I would not vent the radiator to anything but the tank. Never connect a top water line to the suction side of the pump. That just puts air back into the engine. The opposite of what you want to do. In the diagram, there is a swirl pot. It has only one function, and that is to collect air bubbles. All of the circulating coolant must pass through it, and as you can see any such air pops to the top of the swirl pot and is thus removed from the system. Any temperature changes force the trapped air up the small ID hose into the bottom of the tank raising the pressure in the tank to that of whatever cap rating you are running. Only coolant can be recovered when the pressure changes again. So the tank acts as an accumulator. After a heat cycle, you will see that the coolant in the tank has been reduced, or is missing. Refill to half full and run the engine again. It may take 3 or 4 heat cycles to get the coolant level (always half full) to stabilize. After that it never changes. The rotary has a little problem with holding air in the top of the block. It has a bigger problem (because of the high mounted pump) with the pump loosing it's prime. The impeller must be completely submerged. Or, it stops pumping. Very bad. Any time you have had the system open, be sure to hold you hand on the water outlet to establish that coolant flow has started. At the engine speeds that are required, any air will be shoved along at a high rate of speed, and will only collect where there is a space with little flow. Like the top of a swirl pot. So, I suspect that that it would not be a requirement to add top water bleeds anywhere. I don't have any, and I just don't have any heating problems. Once all of the air is removed, there are no problems. I have a Shrader valve in my tank, and I charge the system before I start the engine. I also have a pressure gage that lets you know when there may be a problem in the system. Lynn E. Hanover