Return-Path: Received: from imo-m02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2924168 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:49:01 -0500 Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-m02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r4.8.) id q.17f.24c9265d (4340) for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:48:57 -0500 (EST) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: <17f.24c9265d.2d2f9ac9@aol.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:48:57 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 In a message dated 1/8/2004 9:31:36 PM Central Standard Time, daveleonard@cox.net writes: << Is there a danger letting the temps of the rotor housings > operate at a higher temp as long as we are below the melting point by a > safe margin(say 350 vs the water cooled 200-250)? > Ignorance is bliss! :-) > > MikeJ > >> Go to www.racingbeat.com and order the technical/parts catalog. The bible of the rotary engine builder. Lynn E. Hanover