Return-Path: Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2923585 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:00:58 -0500 Received: from [68.211.137.240] by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040108220053.EDSL1944.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[68.211.137.240]> for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:00:53 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:00:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Cooling From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 1/8/04 12:15 PM, "Michael Joyce" wrote: > Another newbie question. > After reading Paul Lamar's cooling text: > http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/how-to-cool12.txt I was left > wondering if water coolant could be replaced by a liquid with a higher > boiling point (such as oil). That combined with running the coolant at > a constant higher temp might lead to an increase in cooling efficiency > since the difference between the external air and the coolant could be > increased. Is there a danger letting the temps of the rotor housings > operate at a higher temp as long as we are below the melting point by a > safe margin(say 350 vs the water cooled 200-250)? > Ignorance is bliss! :-) > > MikeJ > > Mike oil has very poor heat carrying properties. Nothing is better than water. You are not the first one to come up with the idea :) Bulent Aliev Ft Lauderdale, FL 954 557-1019 954 784-5519 Fax bulent@enginegearonline.com http://www.enginegearonline.com