Return-Path: Received: from imo-r04.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.100] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2917064 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 20:22:27 -0500 Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r4.8.) id q.4d.39770dfe (17526) for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 20:22:24 -0500 (EST) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: <4d.39770dfe.2d2a164f@aol.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 20:22:23 EST Subject: Comments on Comments To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 Improve the engines: And there is no reason that the private industry can't do this. Lycoming=20 started out making sewing machines and bicycles, they got into engines=20 because of demand in the market place. There is no reason for the big two to do anything to improve anything. There= =20 is only the bottom line. They have a totally captive audience. You have to b= uy=20 OEM parts by law. They have a giant cash cow running now. Why screw around with it. If they=20 could think of a way to ship you an empty box with Lycoming stamped on the s= ide,=20 and get away with it, they would be doing that. It=E2=80=99s just business to them. =20 Every year at OSH and SNF there are new engines. And then the following=20 year they are gone. The people that show up with them must not be racers. Well now, if that was United Technologies standing there with that new desig= n=20 instead an average guy with a great idea and no money, would it be successful? You=20 can bet the farm it would. United Technologies would lowball request for quo= tes=20 from airframe builders, who would be idiots not to use the new "Pratt and=20 Whitney" Which P&W is going to give away (in effect) in large quantities to=20= all of=20 the major airframe manufacturers. How so? There is a filter manufacturer that makes a very high (aircraft and=20 submarine) quality line of products. Let us call them Giant Filter Corp. The= ir=20 catalogue is on the shelves of every airplane and ship manufacturer. So=20 airplane builder Skunk Works, publishes a top drawing with size and performa= nce=20 data. Burst strength, absolute micron rating and so on, for a 4,000 PSI hydr= aulic=20 flight control system, on the new Skunk Works model Whatever. A number of filter manufacturers submit drawings with the same values as=20 those specified on the Request for quote top drawing, Along with their best=20= price=20 per unit and quantity price break structure. So let us say that three=20 companies are around $2,200.00 per unit. But our friends at Giant Filter Cor= p come in=20 at $125.00, and a much better price break structure. Everyone in the filter=20 industry knows that Giant Filter Corp is going to loose their butts on every= =20 unit. But (excuse the pun) Giant Filter doesn't care because they will then=20= be=20 the OEM for a total of thirty two filter assemblies on the Skunk Works model= =20 Whatever. When your beloved Federal Government starts buying replacement ele= ments=20 and complete assemblies, the price is now $12,000.00, and the replacement=20 element is $2,650.00. Out year sales for this filter alone are estimated at= 5.5=20 million. And they own thirty two filters on this airframe. That same Giant=20 Filter Corp filter is also in their commercial catalogue with a different pa= rt=20 number, as is the element. The price is $2,200 and the elements are $125.00=20 each.=20 The prices would come down because we the people, could start our own engine= =20 company.=20 There is no reason why this can't happen. The point I have been trying to=20 get across is that there have been dozens of attempts to create viable=20 aircraft engines by very qualified and well funded people. Orenda's=20 Chrysler conversion comes to mind as a group of "racers" that tried to make=20 big block Chryslers run with the larger Lycomings and even turbines. Lets=20 not forget Porsche and their PFM-3200 engines. One can hardly suggest that=20 the Porsche company does not have the "racers" to back up its 50 year=20 history of performance cars. They got the engines certified, Mooney built=20 planes for them, and they got STC's to install them in C-172s. These and=20 others were far from backyard efforts. They were economically unviable for=20 some reason. First you should point out that both engines are outstanding pieces of=20 engineering. And years ahead of the big two, lacking only a big price advant= age that=20 would have generated any interest at all.=20 The price would have to be low enough that the conversion would make some=20 kind of sense to potential customers. I think the Orenda is a proprietary ca= sting=20 along BB Chevy lines.=20 Neither effort was well funded. United Technologies could buy both operation= s=20 and run them through a shredder with a weeks worth of the coffee fund. If you want to play, set aside 100 million and be prepared to support that=20 investment for ten years before you get back anything. But by then all new=20 airframes will be equipped with your new design, because you will be practic= ally=20 giving them to Piper and others. The big two will be making sewing machines=20 again. Or airboat motors that won=E2=80=99t kill my friends when it swallows= a valve. Drop in to Sun&Fun and take a look at the rotary engine parking row at the=20 west end of the show line. Maybe a rotary will win the Sun 100 again. If Tra= cy=20 would let me work over his engine for a few weeks, he could put that record=20 speed up where no piston engine could ever find it. Lynn E. Hanover. =20 =20