Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2904285 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:03:12 -0500 Received: from o7y6b5 (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id hBOL39Ac021143 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:03:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000801c3ca60$f13ec600$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Streamline Vs Parabolic Ducts/Diffusers Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:00:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3CA37.081C72C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3CA37.081C72C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message=20 From: Russell Duffy=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 3:04 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Streamline Vs Parabolic Ducts/Diffusers What also becomes clearer is that given sufficient air mass flow and = surface area, just about any configuration will cool your engine. The = problem is that it will be larger and heavier than an optimum system = design - perhaps much larger {:>).=20 BUC is gone, but not forgotten :-) Rusty =20 Actually, I think BUC will go down in the cooling annals of history as = proof of the above statement {:>). But, hey - no one who was here = during that time will ever forget BUC. Sorry, that probably wasn't what = you wanted to hear {:>) Happy Holiday, Rusty Ed ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3CA37.081C72C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
 
From:=20 Russell=20 Duffy
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, = 2003 3:04=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Streamline Vs=20 Parabolic Ducts/Diffusers

What also becomes clearer is that given = sufficient air=20 mass flow and surface area, just about any configuration will cool = your=20 engine.  The problem is that it will be larger and heavier than = an=20 optimum system design - perhaps much larger {:>). 
 
BUC is gone, but not forgotten :-)
 
Rusty  
 
Actually, I think=20 BUC will go down in the cooling annals of history as proof of the = above=20 statement {:>).  But, hey - no one who was here during that = time will=20 ever forget BUC.  Sorry, that probably wasn't what you wanted to = hear=20 {:>)
 
Happy Holiday,=20 Rusty
 
Ed=20
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3CA37.081C72C0--