Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2904222 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 15:04:12 -0500 Received: from rad ([68.212.14.235]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031224200412.UVVF1884.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rad> for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 15:04:12 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Streamline Vs Parabolic Ducts/Diffusers Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 14:04:15 -0600 Message-ID: <001401c3ca59$1b489eb0$6001a8c0@rad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0015_01C3CA26.D0AE2EB0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C3CA26.D0AE2EB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What also becomes clearer is that given sufficient air mass flow and surface area, just about any configuration will cool your engine. The problem is that it will be larger and heavier than an optimum system design - perhaps much larger {:>). BUC is gone, but not forgotten :-) Rusty ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C3CA26.D0AE2EB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
What also becomes clearer is that given = sufficient air=20 mass flow and surface area, just about any configuration will cool your=20 engine.  The problem is that it will be larger and heavier than an = optimum=20 system design - perhaps much larger {:>). 
 
BUC is gone, but not forgotten :-)
 
Rusty  
------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C3CA26.D0AE2EB0--