Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2902737 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:50:14 -0500 Received: from rad ([68.212.14.235]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031223195013.WKTL1948.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rad> for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:50:13 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: dual EWP plumbing? Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:50:15 -0600 Message-ID: <035b01c3c98d$fc605810$6001a8c0@rad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_035C_01C3C95B.B1C5E810" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_035C_01C3C95B.B1C5E810 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I agree. But Rusty is talking about placing the pumps after the rads and before the engine. Should be better to place one pump per rad just before the rad.=20 =20 My pump location, and hose routing won't be determined until I get stuff like the intake, and exhaust in place. I still think it will be easier = to put the pumps in the return hose to the engine. I could certainly put = them before the cores, but I'm still not sure I agree with doing that. =20 =20 The factory pump is essentially ahead of the engine, and it's outlet = forces water into the block. The Davies Craig, and Meziere EWP's are designed = to do the same thing. I've always understood that the idea was to = artificially increase the pressure in the block, to raise the boiling point further, = and this seems like as good a reason as any for pump placement. =20 =20 Thanks again for the comments. Rusty (don't know if I'm coming or going) =20 =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_035C_01C3C95B.B1C5E810 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
I agree. But Rusty is talking about placing the pumps after the = rads and=20 before the engine.
Should be better to place one pump per rad just = before the=20 rad. 
 
My pump=20 location, and hose routing won't be determined until I get stuff = like the=20 intake, and exhaust in place.  I still think it will be easier to = put the=20 pumps in the return hose to the engine.  I could certainly put = them=20 before the cores, but I'm still not sure I agree with doing = that. =20
 
The factory=20 pump is essentially ahead of the engine, and it's outlet forces = water into=20 the block.   The Davies Craig, and Meziere EWP's are = designed to=20 do the same thing.  I've always understood that the idea was=20 to artificially increase the pressure in the block, to raise the = boiling=20 point further, and this seems like as good a reason as any for pump=20 placement. 
 
Thanks again=20 for the comments.
Rusty (don't=20 know if I'm coming or going)
 
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_035C_01C3C95B.B1C5E810--