Return-Path: <sladerj@bellsouth.net>
Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP id 2901787 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:53:43 -0500
Received: from TOSHIBAjhr ([209.214.15.28]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP
          id <20031223045342.SIYV20397.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@TOSHIBAjhr>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:53:42 -0500
From: "John Slade" <sladerj@bellsouth.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: dual EWP plumbing?
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:53:41 -0500
Message-ID: <NMELKLCBIAJLEHHCHLJBGENLCNAA.sladerj@bellsouth.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-2901768@logan.com>

> If 1 pump fails after achieving cruise altitude (done
> with climbing), then you will be well within the "'Nuckols"
> envelope of "it isn't critical - you can complete your flight"
That's the point I was trying to make. Is this the case with only half the
coolant? I suspect that with only half the coolant, and only one core, it
might be hard to cool even at cruise.
John