Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:05:42 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.48] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2901482 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 19:51:35 -0500 Received: from user-2injps5.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.121.231.133] helo=Carol) by mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AYall-0007GJ-00 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:51:30 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <002b01c3c8ee$e2b4feb0$0000a398@Carol> From: "sqpilot@earthlink" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: evap core versus radiator X-Original-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:51:21 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0028_01C3C8BC.974404D0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C3C8BC.974404D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Al Gietzen=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:00 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: evap core versus radiator Ed wrote: Ok, Paul Using the K&W formulas, I calculate that the 14x10 core area would handle 120HP at 120MPH TAS, you would need to get to 160 MPH to get = the mass flow to handle 160HP. =20 Just scaling your power number on the basis of core area; it comes to = about 225hp for my setup. I designed for 200 hp at 120 mph; so I guess = that is reasonable close correlation. Either we're both right, or both = wrong J. Al Thanks, AL. Hopefully I will find out in a couple of months. Paul = Conner ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C3C8BC.974404D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Al = Gietzen=20
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 = 10:00=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: evap = core versus=20 radiator

Ed = wrote:

 

Ok, Paul

 

    Using the K&W = formulas, I=20 calculate that the 14x10 core area would

handle 120HP at 120MPH TAS, you would need = to get to=20 160 MPH to get the mass

flow to handle 160HP. =  

 

Just = scaling your=20 power number on the basis of core area; it comes to about 225hp for my = setup.  I designed for 200 hp at 120 mph; so I guess that is = reasonable=20 close correlation.  Either we=92re both right, or both wrong=20 J.

 

Al

Thanks, = AL.=20 Hopefully I will find out in a couple of months.  Paul=20 Conner

------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C3C8BC.974404D0--