Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=208.97.132.66; envelope-from=ryan@deadfrog.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Too damn quiet....and announcemet of my hopefully future pilot sidekick
From: Ryan Wilkins <ryan@deadfrog.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-3920020@logan.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:43:25 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <6B05D9B1-C88F-4DD0-8960-4C90FADEA3A1@deadfrog.net>
References: <list-3920020@logan.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

It comes from some reading around on the Internet.  The hard part is  
trying to figure out fact from fiction.  There's so much information  
floating around that may or may not be relevant.  Add to it my  
inexperience with redrives and rotary engines.  Conceptually, I get  
the idea loud and clear but practically not so much.  Anyway, It's  
good to know that RWS redrives get a thumbs up.

Cheers,

Ryan Wilkins

On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:35 PM, John Slade wrote:
>
> >the real problem lies in the PSRU

> Huh? Where does that come from? I've always thought of the RD1B from  
> Real World Solutions as the most reliable part of my installation  
> and the least likely to break. I know of zero airborne failures of  
> RWS redrives, and one ground failure that was quickly rectified.
>