X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from omta.toronto.rmgopenwave.com ([4.59.182.110] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3896007 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:24:33 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=4.59.182.110; envelope-from=lacombr@nbnet.nb.ca Received: from torspm02.toronto.rmgopenwave.com ([142.167.88.141]) by tormtz04.toronto.rmgopenwave.com (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20091022222400.QLIO21213.tormtz04.toronto.rmgopenwave.com@torspm02.toronto.rmgopenwave.com> for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:24:00 -0400 Received: from PCdeRita ([142.167.88.141]) by torspm02.toronto.rmgopenwave.com with SMTP id <20091022222359.PEZE22555.torspm02.toronto.rmgopenwave.com@PCdeRita> for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:23:59 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Rino" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re spark plugs Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:23:57 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0035_01CA534D.33A7E9B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005 X-Opwv-CommTouchExtSvcRefID: str=0001.0A020206.4AE0DB7F.024C,ss=1,fgs=0 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01CA534D.33A7E9B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I changed my plugs for new ones (NGK iridium), same as the old ones. No = difference in performance, there is some roughness that I am trying to = correct, but I cannot find it. Rino ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Al Gietzen=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:03 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re spark plugs I have at least 60-70 hrs on the Iridium plugs and they are performing = flawlessly. I pulled them out and took a look a few hours ago and they = looked great, so I put them back in. As far as I'm concerned, Iridiums = are the only plugs I will use from here on. This could change if I have = to start burning 100LL. Mark S. Mark, Are you using the Denso IRT 0131 plug? I looked at those, but I can = get 6 sets of the NGK B9EGV for the same amount of money, and get some = change back. I change them at about 35 - 40 hours, or a less if I burn a = couple tanks of 100LL. But I guess if the iridium will go 200 hours it = would be worth the cost. Al G ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01CA534D.33A7E9B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I changed my plugs for new ones (NGK = iridium), same=20 as the old ones.  No difference in performance, there is some = roughness=20 that I am trying to correct, but I cannot find it.
 
Rino
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Al = Gietzen=20
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, = 2009 12:03=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re spark = plugs

 

I have at = least 60-70 hrs=20 on the Iridium plugs and they are performing flawlessly.  I = pulled them=20 out and took a look a few hours ago and they looked great, so I put = them back=20 in.  As far as I'm concerned, Iridiums are the only plugs I will = use from=20 here on.  This could change if I have to start burning=20 100LL.

 Mark=20 S.

 

Mark,

Are you = using the=20 Denso IRT 0131 = plug?  I=20 looked at those, but I can get 6 sets of the NGK B9EGV for the=20 same amount = of money,=20 and get some change back. I change them at about 35 - 40 hours, or a = less if I=20 burn a couple tanks of 100LL. But I guess if the iridium will go 200 = hours it=20 would be worth the cost.

 

Al=20 G

------=_NextPart_000_0035_01CA534D.33A7E9B0--