Return-Path: <keltro@att.net>
Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.117] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP id 2900006 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:32:42 -0500
Received: from 204.127.135.40 ([204.127.135.40])
          by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with SMTP
          id <20031222013241113001c8ave>; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 01:32:41 +0000
Received: from [12.74.169.48] by 204.127.135.40;
	Mon, 22 Dec 2003 01:32:40 +0000
From: keltro@att.net
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Dumb intake question
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 01:32:40 +0000
Message-Id: <122220030132.9322.5a0d@att.net>
X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 10 2003)
X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ=

  Ed,

    Is it possible to get the same effect by extending the runner length
 outside of the throttle body rather than between the intake port and the
 throttle body? My memory may be failing but as I recall the four rotor
 race engine had the sliding intake runners outside the throttle butterflys.
    Inquiring minds want to know!

   Best Regards and Happy Holidays,
   Kelly Troyer 

--
Dyke Delta/13B Rotary Power