|
The chart is based on an engine rpm of
6800.
Bobby
Bobby,
That's realistic and perhaps conservative, what RPM
was that?
George (down under)
Not sure the first email made it through. I would
like to compare the P-Port dyno with supercharger performance at the same rpm
between 5200 and 7500. Attached are my HP estimates and they seem to be close
to Vans actual performance expectations for a 235hp engine. But I am a little
concerned about running the Eaton M62 4th gen this hard. I have not been able
to find any data concerning sustained high rpm operations. If the dyno numbers
look good I may build a P-Port since it would not require any other changes
other than intake. I do plan to eventually put a 3 rotor or 16B p
-port in the plane but I'm not ready for another year of building. Time
to do some flying and spend time with the family.
Thanks Bobby
Paul,
Do you have a
dyno chart from your P-Port Renesis test? If so I would like to get a
copy. Just about got the RV10 back together after several major changes.
Moving the aluminum Berry Mount spacers to the top of the S-Beam almost
corrected my thrust line problem. I was also able to remove most of the
spacers from the rear beam. Still a little angle on the right side that
may require some machine work. It will be interesting to see if it
fly's differently.
Thanks,
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and
UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|