X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [66.219.56.245] (HELO mail.qnsi.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3859538 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:43:52 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.219.56.245; envelope-from=bhughes@qnsi.net Return-Receipt-To: "Bobby J. Hughes" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Private P-Port Renesis Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 09:46:27 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA3940.59DB5BDE" Message-ID: <74120FDE88CAFE4DBDA8814BCE20A3F315EB61@qnsi-mail.qnsi.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: Disposition-Notification-To: "Bobby J. Hughes" Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: Private P-Port Renesis Thread-Index: Aco4+njyyJlxMsYvRX2abUx5zKziVQARbJAg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 References: From: "Bobby J. Hughes" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA3940.59DB5BDE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The chart is based on an engine rpm of 6800.=20 =20 Bobby ________________________________ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of George Lendich Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 12:22 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Private P-Port Renesis Bobby, That's realistic and perhaps conservative, what RPM was that? George (down under) Not sure the first email made it through. I would like to compare the P-Port dyno with supercharger performance at the same rpm between 5200 and 7500. Attached are my HP estimates and they seem to be close to Vans actual performance expectations for a 235hp engine. But I am a little concerned about running the Eaton M62 4th gen this hard. I have not been able to find any data concerning sustained high rpm operations. If the dyno numbers look good I may build a P-Port since it would not require any other changes other than intake. I do plan to eventually put a 3 rotor or 16B p -port in the plane but I'm not ready for another year of building. Time to do some flying and spend time with the family.=20 =20 Thanks Bobby ________________________________ From: Bobby J. Hughes=20 Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 9:39 AM To: 'rotaryeng@earthlink.net' Subject: P-Port Renesis =09 =09 Paul, =20 Do you have a dyno chart from your P-Port Renesis test? If so I would like to get a copy. Just about got the RV10 back together after several major changes. Moving the aluminum Berry Mount spacers to the top of the S-Beam almost corrected my thrust line problem. I was also able to remove most of the spacers from the rear beam. Still a little angle on the right side that may require some machine work. It will be interesting to see if it fly's differently.=20 =20 Thanks, =20 Bobby J Hughes =20 =09 ________________________________ =09 -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html =09 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA3940.59DB5BDE Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The chart is based on an engine rpm of=20 6800. 
 
Bobby

From: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of George=20 Lendich
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 12:22 = AM
To:=20 Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Private = P-Port=20 Renesis

Bobby,
That's realistic and perhaps = conservative, what RPM=20 was that?
George (down under)
Not sure the first email made it through. I = would=20 like to compare the P-Port dyno with supercharger performance at the = same rpm=20 between 5200 and 7500. Attached are my HP estimates and they seem to = be close=20 to Vans actual performance expectations for a 235hp engine. But I am a = little=20 concerned about running the Eaton M62 4th gen this hard. I have not = been able=20 to find any data concerning sustained high rpm operations. If the dyno = numbers=20 look good I may build a P-Port since it would not require any other = changes=20 other than intake. I do plan to eventually put a 3 rotor or 16B p=20 -port in the plane but I'm not ready for another year of = building. Time=20 to do some flying and spend time with the family.
 
Thanks  Bobby

From: Bobby J. Hughes =
Sent: Friday,=20 September 18, 2009 9:39 AM
To:=20 'rotaryeng@earthlink.net'
Subject: P-Port=20 Renesis

Paul,
 
Do = you have a=20 dyno chart from your P-Port Renesis test? If so I would like to = get a=20 copy. Just about got the RV10 back together after several major = changes.=20 Moving the aluminum Berry Mount spacers to the top of the S-Beam = almost=20 corrected my thrust line problem. I was also able to remove most of = the=20 spacers from the rear beam. Still a little angle on the right = side that=20 may require some machine work. It will be interesting to see = if it=20 fly's differently.
 
Thanks,
 
Bobby = J=20 Hughes
 

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and=20 UnSub:  =20 = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
------_=_NextPart_001_01CA3940.59DB5BDE--