X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.17] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3840708 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:24:20 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.30.17; envelope-from=hoursaway1@comcast.net Received: from OMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.28]) by QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id e3rl1c0090cQ2SLAA4PlWm; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:23:45 +0000 Received: from sz0081.ev.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.26.137]) by OMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id e4Pk1c00A2xV6SL8W4PkJk; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:23:44 +0000 Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:23:44 +0000 (UTC) From: hoursaway1@comcast.net To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: <1017358296.6212351252383824852.JavaMail.root@sz0081a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] At long last, First Flight MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_311654_309143827.1252383824851" X-Originating-IP: [76.20.141.85] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.16_GA_2927.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - IE6 (Win)/5.0.16_GA_2927.RHEL5_64) ------=_Part_311654_309143827.1252383824851 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Congrats Tracy on the first flight, we should be close behind you (as long = as you keep the 8 at 1/2 throttle).=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0David R. Cook= =C2=A0 RV6A Rotary=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Tracy Crook" =20 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" =20 Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2009 9:03:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern=20 Subject: [FlyRotary] At long last, First Flight=20 Today there was nothing left to do on the RV-8 but flight test it.=20 =C2=A0Very hot day (93 F and high humidity) but ground tests of the cooling= system had gone so well that I was confident of cooling in flight.=C2=A0= =C2=A0 Installed the radio and transponder in the panel (which for some rea= son I had neglected to do until this morning) and they both worked with no = problems, which is always a surprise.=C2=A0=20 High speed taxi tests had already been completed and the P-factor was no wo= rse than the RV-4, in fact I think it has less.=C2=A0 This may be premature= because I haven't done a full throttle takeoff yet.=C2=A0 The RV-8 has 1.2= 5 degrees right offset which I think helps a lot.=C2=A0 The RV-4 has no off= set.=C2=A0 First flight was done without wheel pants or main gear intersect= ion fairings.=20 Just to make sure there were no surprises, takeoff was done at the same fue= l flow as the RV-4 at WOT.=C2=A0 I didn't note the manifold pressure but th= e throttle quadrant was barely over 1/2 throttle.=C2=A0 Ground run on the -= 8 feels more stable than the -4 with considerably more rudder authority (it= 's physically bigger so no surprise).=C2=A0=C2=A0 The plane broke ground at= about the same point as the -4 but it feels like it levitates off rather t= han rotates off.=C2=A0 Probably due to the higher wing incidence on the gro= und than the -4 with the short gear legs but also due to the longer wing.= =C2=A0 I had extended both wings by about 18" so the wing loading and span = loading are less than on the -4.=C2=A0=C2=A0 It has about 13% more wing are= a than stock.=C2=A0 This was actually the second time the -8 had air under = the tires since it had floated off ground about a foot once before during a= high speed taxi test.=20 Airspeed was increasing rapidly after lift off but the ASI was not matching= the visual ques.=C2=A0=C2=A0 Normally I expect to see 120 mph at the end o= f the runway but ASI shows only 80. Too late to abort but the airplane is c= limbing & sounding very nice.=C2=A0=C2=A0 I had been doing a lot of seat-of= -the pants takeoff and simulated dead stick landings (in the -4) in anticip= ation of today's tests so I would feel comfortable in the event of partial = or complete panel failure=C2=A0 (Blue Mountain EFIS1 with only a standard A= SI for backup).=C2=A0 Climb to 1000 feet felt effortless even after throttl= ing back to 8 GPH.=C2=A0 I notice that I'm hunting for information and not = absorbing much due to the very different instrument panel.=C2=A0=C2=A0 Reme= mbering that the EFIS1 has the primary ASI in a speed ribbon format I hunt = for it and see 0 MPH when I finally find it.=C2=A0 The EM2 shows the same a= irspeed as the steam gauge, now about 100 MPH.=C2=A0 First squawk of the fl= ight and this means I will do the first landing sans airspeed indicator.=C2= =A0 I can't seem to locate the GPS ground speed on the display either.=C2= =A0 Glad I did all that practice.=20 Time to settle in and start evaluating engine performance.=C2=A0 I had take= n off with the engine fairly warm so I was not surprised to see oil & water= temps nearing 190 F after climbout.=C2=A0=C2=A0 I continue collecting data= hoping the temps will start coming down but it is soon apparent that they = are stabilizing at about 200 on both oil and coolant. =C2=A0 Very disappoin= ting, since they had been well below this on the ground when at the same fu= el flow I was currently flying at (I had backed it down to 5.75 gph by this= time).=20 The plane itself is flying beautifully.=C2=A0 The aileron trim is able to t= rim out a very slight left wing heavy tendency and the ship feels like it i= s gliding through the air effortlessly.=C2=A0 Again, no surprise, the plane= feels just like an RV (Magnificent!).=C2=A0 At this speed (guessing about = 135 mph) the roll response=C2=A0 is only slightly slower than the -4.=C2=A0= The ailerons were extended with the wing so the RV feel has been preserved= .=C2=A0 I've completed a wide circuit of the pattern and in position to mak= e an approach so I throttle back and I can immediately tell that the glide = ratio is significantly higher than the -4.=C2=A0=C2=A0 The longer wing is h= aving more effect than I thought it would even with the heavier engine.=C2= =A0 This -8 with a 20B ended up weighing about 70 pounds more than the aver= age one equipped with an 0 - 360 and fixed pitch prop and about the same as= one equipped with an IO - 360 with constant speed prop.=C2=A0 All the atte= ntion to weight control has paid off.=C2=A0 I throttle up for a go around a= nd the FBW throttle responds well, no detectable throttle lag at all.=20 The higher than expected oil and water temps are distracting me from data g= athering (Rats, I haven't had time to replace the EM2 with a data logging E= M3 yet) so I make a few more circuits of the field and setup for an approac= h.=C2=A0 I crank in more flaps early to kill off the airspeed and excess gl= ide ratio and intentionally do not look at the ASI to avoid being confused.= =C2=A0 Wheel landing touchdown is perfect and now I glance at the ASI and s= ee 40 MPH.=C2=A0 Obviously wrong.=20 All in all, a great first flight.=C2=A0 The RV-8 is going to be exactly the= airplane I was hoping for. =C2=A0 Still a lot of testing and tweaking to d= o.=20 Tracy =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=20 ------=_Part_311654_309143827.1252383824851 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <= div style=3D'font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>Congrats = Tracy on the first flight, we should be close behind you (as long as you ke= ep the 8 at 1/2 throttle).     David R. Cook  RV6A= Rotary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tracy Crook" <tracy@r= otaryaviation.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lanc= aironline.net>
Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2009 9:03:04 PM GMT -05:00 = US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [FlyRotary] At long last, First Flight
Today there was nothing left to do on the RV-8 but flight test it.
 Very hot day (93 F and high humidity) but ground tests of the coolin= g system had gone so well that I was confident of cooling in flight. &= nbsp; Installed the radio and transponder in the panel (which for some reas= on I had neglected to do until this morning) and they both worked with no p= roblems, which is always a surprise. 

High speed taxi tests ha= d already been completed and the P-factor was no worse than the RV-4, in fa= ct I think it has less.  This may be premature because I haven't done = a full throttle takeoff yet.  The RV-8 has 1.25 degrees right offset w= hich I think helps a lot.  The RV-4 has no offset.  First flight = was done without wheel pants or main gear intersection fairings.

Jus= t to make sure there were no surprises, takeoff was done at the same fuel f= low as the RV-4 at WOT.  I didn't note the manifold pressure but the t= hrottle quadrant was barely over 1/2 throttle.  Ground run on the -8 f= eels more stable than the -4 with considerably more rudder authority (it's = physically bigger so no surprise).   The plane broke ground at ab= out the same point as the -4 but it feels like it levitates off rather than= rotates off.  Probably due to the higher wing incidence on the ground= than the -4 with the short gear legs but also due to the longer wing. = ; I had extended both wings by about 18" so the wing loading and span loadi= ng are less than on the -4.   It has about 13% more wing area tha= n stock.  This was actually the second time the -8 had air under the t= ires since it had floated off ground about a foot once before during a high= speed taxi test.

Airspeed was increasing rapidly after lift off but= the ASI was not matching the visual ques.   Normally I expect to= see 120 mph at the end of the runway but ASI shows only 80. Too late to ab= ort but the airplane is climbing & sounding very nice.   I ha= d been doing a lot of seat-of-the pants takeoff and simulated dead stick la= ndings (in the -4) in anticipation of today's tests so I would feel comfort= able in the event of partial or complete panel failure  (Blue Mountain= EFIS1 with only a standard ASI for backup).  Climb to 1000 feet felt = effortless even after throttling back to 8 GPH.  I notice that I'm hun= ting for information and not absorbing much due to the very different instr= ument panel.   Remembering that the EFIS1 has the primary ASI in = a speed ribbon format I hunt for it and see 0 MPH when I finally find it.&n= bsp; The EM2 shows the same airspeed as the steam gauge, now about 100 MPH.=   First squawk of the flight and this means I will do the first landin= g sans airspeed indicator.  I can't seem to locate the GPS ground spee= d on the display either.  Glad I did all that practice.

Time t= o settle in and start evaluating engine performance.  I had taken off = with the engine fairly warm so I was not surprised to see oil & water t= emps nearing 190 F after climbout.   I continue collecting data h= oping the temps will start coming down but it is soon apparent that they ar= e stabilizing at about 200 on both oil and coolant.   Very disappointi= ng, since they had been well below this on the ground when at the same fuel= flow I was currently flying at (I had backed it down to 5.75 gph by this t= ime).

The plane itself is flying beautifully.  The aileron trim= is able to trim out a very slight left wing heavy tendency and the ship fe= els like it is gliding through the air effortlessly.  Again, no surpri= se, the plane feels just like an RV (Magnificent!).  At this speed (gu= essing about 135 mph) the roll response  is only slightly slower than = the -4.  The ailerons were extended with the wing so the RV feel has b= een preserved.  I've completed a wide circuit of the pattern and in po= sition to make an approach so I throttle back and I can immediately tell th= at the glide ratio is significantly higher than the -4.   The lon= ger wing is having more effect than I thought it would even with the heavie= r engine.  This -8 with a 20B ended up weighing about 70 pounds more t= han the average one equipped with an 0 - 360 and fixed pitch prop and about= the same as one equipped with an IO - 360 with constant speed prop.  = All the attention to weight control has paid off.  I throttle up for a= go around and the FBW throttle responds well, no detectable throttle lag a= t all.

The higher than expected oil and water temps are distracting = me from data gathering (Rats, I haven't had time to replace the EM2 with a = data logging EM3 yet) so I make a few more circuits of the field and setup = for an approach.  I crank in more flaps early to kill off the airspeed= and excess glide ratio and intentionally do not look at the ASI to avoid b= eing confused.  Wheel landing touchdown is perfect and now I glance at= the ASI and see 40 MPH.  Obviously wrong.

All in all, a great = first flight.  The RV-8 is going to be exactly the airplane I was hopi= ng for.   Still a lot of testing and tweaking to do.

Tracy &nbs= p;   
------=_Part_311654_309143827.1252383824851--