Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #4781
From: sqpilot@earthlink <sqpilot@earthlink.net>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: SINGLE ROTOR
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:08:04 -0500
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 9:30 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: SINGLE ROTOR

my engine is a 1.48lb/hp and the AeroV VW is 1.98lb/hp. It doesn't get much better, especially if one wants to stay with existing technology.
 
Richard Sohn
 
 
Don't get me wrong Richard.  I'm mighty impressed with what you've done.   It's just unfortunate (for me) that it's still a bit too heavy to use in place of a 912, or VW, since those are the types of planes that I've been looking at recently. 
 
Cheers,
Rusty
 
Hey, Rusty.....have you considered the smaller 2-rotor Wankels similar to the one they have here at the St Elmo airport that is installed in a two seat ultralight?  That model is only 80 HP, but I understand the newer models are 120 HP?  It is a very neat, compact, small engine, with a very small frontal view/size.  The intake/injectors really hug the engine, making it one of the most compact engines I have seen.  Looks like it would fit in my glove compartment. For what it's worth.  After you fly off your 40 hours, maybe you'd like to take a short flight over to St Elmo (next to Mobile, AL) and I would be happy to show it to you.  The owner is a friend of mine.  Take care.  Paul Conner
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster