Return-Path: Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2893197 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:36:06 -0500 Received: (qmail 4771 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2003 16:36:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frontiernet.net) ([67.50.125.137]) (envelope-sender ) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.6) with SMTP for ; 16 Dec 2003 16:36:05 -0000 Message-ID: <3FDF34E1.BA228FED@frontiernet.net> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:37:53 -0600 From: Jim Sower X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Fuel system References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <... not sure how quickly they would level if fuel was returned to only one tank ...> Depends on tubing size and some intangibles like fuel cap seal, crabbing etc. My Velocity has a 5-gal sump gravity fed from the strakes with 3/8" ID tubing with engine fed from sump. I've been putzing with it for a couple of years trying to make it feed symmetrically. I've gotten to where the Left tank only has 3 or 4 gals in it when the Right tank gets empty. This is a common problem in configurations of this type. I think you'd be better off with positive control over delivery from the wings - perhaps something similar to what I described in a recent post. That's how it works for me ... Jim S. Joseph Berki wrote: > Thanks for the response on fuel system ideas. Rusty explained the > secondary rail and I hope I got this right. Fuel is delivered at pressure > to primary injector rail then to secondary rail then to regulator which > feeds the return line back to the tank. My thinking was that i intended to > connect both strake tanks together with a tunnel and a sump in the center > where fuel would be pumped to the rail system. Even though the tanks are > connected I was not sure how quickly they would level if fuel was returned > to only one tank. I was thinking of splitting the rail system into two and > returning to both tanks ie forward rotor to port tank and rear rotor to > starboard tank. If the fuel could level on all conditions then the fuel > could be returned to one tank. To implement this you would need two > primary rails two secondary rails and two regulators. I may not need to > split the rail system. > > Joe Berki > Limo EZ > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html -- Jim Sower Crossville, TN; Chapter 5 Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T