Return-Path: Received: from seraph2.grc.nasa.gov ([128.156.10.11] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2891442 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:20:18 -0500 Received: from lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.112.33]) by seraph2.grc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4643068A6F for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:20:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from apataki-fi.grc.nasa.gov (apataki-fi.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.112.35]) by lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBFCKHQx011230 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:20:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from GESS20.grc.nasa.gov (gess20.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.63.20]) by apataki-fi.grc.nasa.gov (8.12.10 GRC/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBFCKHid022844 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:20:17 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20031215071437.03660c68@pop.grc.nasa.gov> X-Sender: scberki@pop.grc.nasa.gov X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:20:16 -0500 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: Joseph Berki Subject: Fuel System Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I am still looking at different designs for a fuel system. AC has two separate tanks. Since we are using two rotors is it possible to split the fuel rail into two rails and have one of the returns plumbed to the port tank and the other plumbed to the starboard tank? Any problems splitting the fuel rail? Just a crazy idea. Joe Berki LimoEZ