Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #4753
From: Al Gietzen <ALVentures@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: evap core versus radiator
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:37:03 -0800
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Be aware that AC evaporators are designed for much lower flow rate of a completely different fluid.  It is fortunate that some cores make relatively effective coolant radiators.  But before using one you (or someone) should check the pressure drop with the fluid we use; either water of or 50/50 water/EG, at the flow rate you need.  Be particular careful about connecting 2 units in series.

 

A 5/8” dia provides only about 1/3 sq in of x-sectional area for flow.  On a 2-rotor you’ll want flow capability of at least 25 gpm.  In a 5/8 dia opening this is a flow velocity of about 25 ft/sec.  That is high, and results in significant pressure drop.  The pressure drop in an AC core can also be high depending on the design. 

 

Connecting 2 of these in parallel can work, a la Tracy Crook et. al.  Putting all the flow through one (and one that no one has tried before), or two in series is not a good idea, certainly not without doing some flow testing first.

 

Go to Griffin, or other custom radiator vendor with your heat load, coolant and air flow rates, and configuration constraints and have them quote you a radiator. 

 

Just my opinion, of course.

 

Al

 

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: evap core versus radiator

 

Tracy and I are using 5/8" inlets and 3/4" outlets.
4 1/2" is about 1" thicker than what we use.

Finn

sqpilot@earthlink wrote:

Hi, fellow rotary enthusiasts.....I am confused regarding radiator versus evaporator cores. Ed Klepeis can make a radiator for me that measures overall 16 x 10 x 4 1/2, by sandwiching two 2 1/4" thick cores together. Unfortunately, there are two 2" wide tanks on each end, which reduces the cooling fin area to 12" x 10" x 4 1/2".  I calculate that to a total area of around 540.

     I have found an evap. core that measures 9 x 13 1/2 x 4 5/8" thick. I believe that comes out to a total area of around 561. That would fit perfectly in the cowling with even less modifications to inlets, etc. (Read that as less work for me).  I have heard on this forum that evap. cores are a good choice for cooling, as they can take high pressures.  Is there anything else I should consider regarding radiator versus evap core for cooling? Inlet and outlet tubes look to be around 5/8". The core looks just like one from a GM Safari or Astro Van except for the size difference.  I don't know if the 5/8" inlet/outlet tubes would be too restrictive to flow compared to a radiator that would be made with 1" NPT inlet/outlets?  My guess is that once the water gets inside either the evap core or the radiator, flow is going to be restricted by the tubing sizes inside the cooling device  regardless of the inlet/outlet sizes? I know that Ed Anderson, Tracy and others have had success with evap cores.  Any possible pros and cons would be much appreciated.  Thank you for your time and opinions.  Paul Conner

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster