Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #47042
From: Bill Schertz <wschertz@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: INJECTION OIL IN FUEL
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 20:26:25 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Don't forget to add the speed of the airplane to your numbers.
Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser #4045
N343BS
Phase I testing
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 8:45 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: INJECTION OIL IN FUEL

This is what I figured out as my "formula":

Max Prop RPM & Speed of Sound

1 Mile = 5,280 Feet

Speed of Sound =  768 mph (I think this is at sea level barometric pressure, I haven't figured out what happens with altitude.)

pi = 3.1429

6 FT (72") D (Diameter) Prop

CIRCUMFERENCE =  pi X D =   3.1429  X  6 ft  = 18.857 ft Circumference

1 RPM = 18.857 ft/Minute at prop tip

With 2:1 PSRU Reduction, calculate by prop RPM and Circumference:
Prop RPM 3,000 (Engine RPM 6,000) =  56,571 ft/Minute = 10.714 miles/minute = 642.84 MPH
(768 MPH - 642.84 MPH  = 125.16 MPH under Speed of Sound)
Prop RPM 3,500 (Engine RPM 7,000) =  66,000 ft/Minute = 12.5 miles/minute = 750 MPH
(768 MPH - 750 MPH  = 18 MPH under Speed of Sound)
================================================
I paid enough attention in my math classes to think I've got it right.

Here's one for you: Does a cogbelt PSRU's powerlimit increase with a wider belt? Like, for example, if a two incher can handle 150 HP, then you might need a four inch belt to handle 300 HP. Something like that?
Here's another: One maker put an engine RPM limit on the PSRU, and I'm thinking it has to do with the capability of the bearing at the input end. Maybe because these bearings are sealed - they don't run in an oil bath.
Thank you, Bernie.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster