X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <WRJJRS@aol.com>
Received: from imo-m28.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.9] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14)
  with ESMTP id 3749359 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:57:02 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.9; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com
Received: from  imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (imo-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.137]) by imo-m28.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN2-34a54c19f223; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:56:15 -0400
Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com
	by imo-ma02.mx.aol.com  (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id q.d6a.47c5dfa6 (37139)
	 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:56:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtprly-db02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-db02.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.153]) by cia-ma03.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMA031-5c394a54c19832f; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:56:11 -0400
Received: from webmail-mx06 (webmail-mx06.sim.aol.com [64.12.137.16]) by smtprly-db02.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDB027-5c394a54c19832f; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:56:08 -0400
References: <list-3748776@logan.com>
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: INJECTION OIL IN FUEL
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:56:08 -0400
X-AOL-IP: 64.12.78.137
In-Reply-To: <list-3748776@logan.com>
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: wrjjrs@aol.com
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
 boundary="--------MB_8CBCDFBBE0F0FA2_13B4_408_webmail-mx06.sysops.aol.com"
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 43735-STANDARD
Received: from 66.253.96.220 by webmail-mx06.sysops.aol.com (64.12.137.16) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:56:08 -0400
Message-Id: <8CBCDFBBDE1C2CE-13B4-1EC@webmail-mx06.sysops.aol.com>
X-Spam-Flag:NO


----------MB_8CBCDFBBE0F0FA2_13B4_408_webmail-mx06.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Bernie,
You are precisely correct. Most of the cog belt systems are put together with no dampening device whatsoever. These systems were usually never checked for torsional vibration at all. Most of the time the builders were just lucky enough that the vibration period was outside the normal operational range.?Having read the article you can see that even experts have?often overlooked these checks. Now dual-mass flywheels are also available to help get the vibration out of the normal operational range.?

Bill Jepson?


-----Original Message-----
From: Berniehb7448@wmconnect.com
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2009 7:31 pm
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: INJECTION OIL IN FUEL


This is excellent reading, Bill! ?Maybe this should have its own heading, like "Cog Belt PSRUs". 

I've been collecting pictures and descriptions of cog belt PSRUs just for my own information, looking at different examples. Plus looking at other types of PSRUs, this is the way I started to understand that COG BELTS CANNOT BE USED TO ISOLATE TORTIONAL VIBRATION. One thing that bothered me - unless most of the anti-vibration couplers were very cleverly hidden, I did not see any at all, because the input cog pulleys all looked like they were mounted directly onto the flywheel. How come? Unless I'm really, REALLY missing something. What say you? 
Bernie. 

----------MB_8CBCDFBBE0F0FA2_13B4_408_webmail-mx06.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<WBR>Bernie,<br>
You are precisely correct. Most of the cog belt systems are put together with no dampening device whatsoever. These systems were usually never checked for torsional vibration at all. Most of the time the builders were just <U>lucky</U> enough that the vibration period was outside the normal operational range.&nbsp;Having read the article you can see that even experts have&nbsp;often overlooked these checks. Now dual-mass flywheels are also available to help get the vibration out of the normal operational range.&nbsp;<br>
<br>
Bill Jepson&nbsp;<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Berniehb7448@wmconnect.com<br>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft &lt;flyrotary@lancaironline.net&gt;<br>
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2009 7:31 pm<br>
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: INJECTION OIL IN FUEL<br>
<br>


<div id=AOLMsgPart_2_4a2fc198-20c7-45c5-b3f8-f2f9faffe8f3><FONT face=arial,helvetica><FONT size=2>This is excellent reading, Bill! &nbsp;Maybe this should have its own heading, like "Cog Belt PSRUs". <br>
<br>
I've been collecting pictures and descriptions of cog belt PSRUs just for my own information, looking at different examples. Plus looking at other types of PSRUs, this is the way I started to understand that COG BELTS CANNOT BE USED TO ISOLATE TORTIONAL VIBRATION. One thing that bothered me - unless most of the anti-vibration couplers were very cleverly hidden, I did not see any at all, because the input cog pulleys all looked like they were mounted directly onto the flywheel. How come? Unless I'm really, REALLY missing something. What say you? <br>
Bernie.</FONT> </div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_2_4a2fc198-20c7-45c5-b3f8-f2f9faffe8f3 --></FONT><div id='MAILCIAMA031-5c394a54c19832f' class='aol_ad_footer'><br/><font style="color:black;font:normal 10pt arial,san-serif;"> <hr style="margin-top:10px"/><A HREF=http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221917659x1201411421/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Faltfarm.mediaplex.com%2Fad%2Fck%2F12309%2D81939%2D1629%2D2>Popular laptop deals plus free shipping!</A></font> </div>

----------MB_8CBCDFBBE0F0FA2_13B4_408_webmail-mx06.sysops.aol.com--