X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net ([207.115.11.54] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3748514 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:22:53 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.115.11.54; envelope-from=bbradburry@bellsouth.net Received: from desktop (adsl-230-69-48.mco.bellsouth.net[74.230.69.48]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with SMTP id <20090707222217H0400euksae>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:22:17 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [74.230.69.48] From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: rotor 2 leading, rotor 2 leading b Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:22:21 -0400 Message-ID: <453E3F744B534948BBDA7EB6AC162A11@Desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acn/TyVLOuKfkowPRVWXWej/3lE5TQAAcCcg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 Steve, I hope Lynn chimes in here. He has seen a lot of plugs under a lot of conditions. They look pitted to me. There seems nothing wrong with your conditions. The only thing on the list would be too lean.?? Someone is out there writing up a great response right now! :>) Bill B -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of sboese Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 6:05 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: rotor 2 leading, rotor 2 leading b Bill, The engine is normally aspirated. Very little time was spent at more than 23 inches of manifold pressure with the majority of it at 21 inches or less. My home field density altitude is almost always 7500 ft or higher. The fuel used was about equal amounts of either 87 octane Mogas or 100LL. Static timing was set up as in the EC2 manual. Operation was at either max power mixture setting (ROP EGT) for take off and climb or about 60 degrees LOP EGT for cruise. Do any of the above conditions seem unreasonable? The appearance in the pictures is what I have normally seen at less than 20 hours of plug operation in the 130 hours the plane has been flying. Steve Boese -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Bradburry Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 3:43 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Emailing: rotor 2 leading, rotor 2 leading b Steve, You did that in only 15 hours!? Those plugs look like they were too lean. They are pitted and the electrode is pitted as well. On the NGK site .Over-advanced ignition timing .Fuel octane rating too low (knock is present) .Excessively lean air-fuel mixture How much boost are you running? Bill B -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of sboese Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 5:05 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Emailing: rotor 2 leading, rotor 2 leading b Ed, Here are two pictures of a plug removed after 15 hours of use, half with 100LL. All the plugs look very similar. Does this plug look typical to you and satisfy your definition of "no discernable wear"? I'm just trying to satisfy myself that I'm not seeing something anomolous. Steve Boese -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html