Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=75.180.132.123; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <4A4F9D20.3000400@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:19:12 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Corruption of EC settings
References: <list-3744924@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-3744924@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Al Gietzen wrote:
>
> Al,
>
> Do you know of any alternatives out there now that might be worth a look?
>
> Bryan
>
> Preparing to commit $$$ to EC
>
> Bryan;
>
> I haven’t looked any further since prior to the final stages of 
> getting my EC2 working. The basic issue (besides cost) is always that 
> the systems are set up for automotive use, and although they may be 
> noise tolerant, have complexities that make them awkward for aviation 
> use. And there is the issue of redundancy. Tracy had good reason for 
> developing his own.
>
> Al
>

You might consider the MegaSquirt.

The problem with MegaSquirt is that it is another DIY solution. If you 
go that direction, you'll be own your own for the most part. This is 
another one of those areas where no one should try to talk you into it, 
because they won't be able to talk you out of it if you should be doing it.

-- 

http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org