Hi Ed;
    You're most likely right on the money, about what would happen, however I guess I'm just hoping that if it ever happened, a few more minutes might be enough. Long ago I ran a 3/8" tube with a 1/8" hole every 3" from the firewall, following the path of my fuel feed line. The other side of the bulkhead fitting was a hose that connects to the cockpit fire extinquisher. I replaced the little plastic nozzle with a tube fitting. The hose is only on there finger tight, so can be easily removed for normal use, but if connected to the hose it should fill the engine compartment with dry chemical suppresant. Sort of a poor-mans engine bay fire suppresion system. Never tested it yet, mostly because I don't want to clean it up afterwards, but I'm thinking maybe I should come-up with a mock engine bay, start a small controlled fuel fed fire inside, use a pair of leaf blowers into the intakes and see how well it works. A bit of work to do something that would be representive of an in-flight fire, but it might be fun!

Todd
C-FSTB
RV9 13B

On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 21:36 -0400, Ed Anderson wrote:

Hi Todd,

 

Certainly the horror  of in-flight fire is something aviators have faced since WWI.  I commend you on your effort to minimize any FWF combustion event (other than inside the engine).  However, I must tell you I have some doubts about the protection you may think you are getting.  This comes across to me more of a heat shield kit than a fire shield kit.  Here are some of my reasons for  why I believe you may not be getting the protection you think: