Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2801037 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 10:19:02 -0500 Received: from nc.rr.com (cpe-024-211-190-025.nc.rr.com [24.211.190.25]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id hB6FJ0d2017631 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:19:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FD1F024.5070407@nc.rr.com> Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 10:05:08 -0500 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: spray bars References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Ed Anderson wrote: > Then you would need to figure out the spray flow rate so you wouldn't be > spraying more water than the core heat could evaporate and therefore wasting > it. You would also need to figure out an adequate spray pattern, build/buy > the nozzles, water pump, water container, etc. But, certainly doable. > Tracy Crook at one time used one when he was being held on the ground for > extend periods and needed more cooling than airflow from prop was providing. A quick solution might be those spayers that they sell to sunbathers to keep cool. A pump sprays an extremely fine mist, that is really quite cold. Would a 'mist-assist' cooling system work better with a long plenum and thick radiator? My thinking is that the extra distance would give the water sufficient time to evaporate completely. -- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, alleviated by information and experience." Veeduber