X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3647381 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 May 2009 17:45:18 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.24.100.45; envelope-from=lendich@aanet.com.au Received: from mail.aanet.com.au (mail.aanet.com.au [203.24.100.34]) by poplet2.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7CA173655 for ; Wed, 20 May 2009 05:44:26 +0800 (WST) Received: from ownerf1fc517b8 (203.171.92.134.static.rev.aanet.com.au [203.171.92.134]) by mail.aanet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id A25C846085A for ; Wed, 20 May 2009 05:44:12 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: <8EC9A42409804969A88CA8FA9CA63DEA@ownerf1fc517b8> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Phonic Band gap filter Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 07:44:13 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Ernest, Certainly interested any results either good or bad, George (down under) > George Lendich wrote: >> Al, >> I would off- set the tubes, the idea is to not have a direct path for the >> sound waves to travel in a direct line, front to back (path of least >> resistance) make them stainless and of a reasonable thickness. >> George (down under) > George, we're skinning a different cat here. We can actually have a > completely see-through muffler. The idea is to control interference > patterns so that certain frequencies are canceled. The dimensions are > critical to determining what frequencies are canceled, and the depth and > width of the band gap is heavily influenced by the difference in Young's > Modulus between the two materials. The greater the difference, the more > pronounced the effect. > > My ultimate goal is a stainless box using .050" material. It takes about > 10ft of tube to make what you saw in the pictures. I think the technique > will be to make a box, then drill the hole pattern all the way through. > Push a tube into each hole, and then weld the tube to the box on both > sides. With this constructions, air can flow through the tubes to keep > the steel strong and help cool the exhaust. > > I did just think of something. My experiment wasn't as valid as it could > have been. I should have run a test with just the filter box in place. > That is, the wooden box with the filter elements removed. It could have > been the box had more to do with the results than the filter elements. > I'll update you when I've run another test. > > -- > > http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >