X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-qy0-f136.google.com ([209.85.221.136] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTP id 3578130 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:50:39 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.221.136; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by qyk42 with SMTP id 42so2760610qyk.7 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:50:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TaeYiO486IP41AhxUbq2fVdeEt2ahsRTc286pjSziMY=; b=L6kjfZJWVXSFaHpGWwWPmiX31s4x4aa+8+niC7+kOCAMeMtqmdZp+qJGoHRmVYJR+A sTsxQJjpvUTHYDumqIInzphpq5xwyiY6wjv5YC64aIlj6sGV/f5SWvaefuHijS0xR6VX +UMbg9rsKAzdgX+50zlawUfC8mXudNpSRgyfQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=f5zQcx0SOjeq17fLMR3bZY+QGHKDFyOhWyb/cuC1hEN9Xas8NyNMC8bQCSlo8FQolB ceGDxS9jMXQ1QQRWUK1rBtRlIlbP+/OtgPIEwFcfnnqSpImavsbXIzYDp2tX5jeHgL0N NEN/O+3kOkwjGdxQq2IznrXB71X4GUrSJOqsg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.67.204 with SMTP id s12mr5302907qai.306.1239544202441; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:50:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:50:02 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: eac52398724cea28 Message-ID: <1b4b137c0904120650v29faca83nefdec4d758775f27@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake manifold From: Tracy Crook To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cdeb8deb62704675bdf1c --0015175cdeb8deb62704675bdf1c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'd give more than $.02 for that data as well but very few of us go through the step of Dyno testing. In the absence of that, I'd suggest a fuel flow reading at max power with mixture set slightly rich of Stoic. RPM needed as well of course. My 2nd gen. 13B burned about 20 GPH at 7400 RPM under those conditions. Airspeed was well beyond Vne so did not test for long there. Tracy On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Greg Ward wrote: > *After everyone gets these different variations fired up, I would like to > see the different horsepower/weight figures. I think it would help all > future builders to get a consensus of what works best. We saw weight and > tunability as major factors here.* > *Greg Ward* > *Lancair 20B in Progress* > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Steve Parkins > *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft > *Sent:* Saturday, April 11, 2009 10:48 PM > *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: Intake manifold > > same thing i did,only with the inj. moved to the out side. > > steve parkins > > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:33:55 -0500 > > From: philwhite9@aol.com > > To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net > > Subject: Re: Intake manifold > > > > Steve: I have cut about 2.5" off the top of the final intake manifold > > piece (see photo), and plan to fabricate a horizontal tapered tube atop > > this, with throttle body at the front for a ram air intake system. > > Haven't worked out the details of the added top yet. > > > > Phil > > RV-10 w/20B mounted > > ps: Steve; if you want the full size photo, let me know off-line. > > __________________ > > > Subject: > > > intake > > > From: > > > Steve Parkins > > > Date: > > > Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:14:18 -0700 > > > > > > > > > i have cut down a stock 20b intake and want to know if any one has > > > done this befor ? > > > > > > steve parkins > > > > ------------------------------ > Quick access to your favorite MSN content and Windows Live with Internet > Explorer 8. Download FREE now! > > ------------------------------ > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > --0015175cdeb8deb62704675bdf1c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'd give more than $.02 for that data as well but very few of us go thr= ough the step of Dyno testing.=A0 In the absence of that, I'd suggest a= fuel flow reading at max power with mixture set slightly rich of Stoic.=A0= RPM needed as well of course.=A0 My 2nd gen. 13B burned about 20 GPH at 74= 00 RPM under those conditions.=A0 Airspeed was well beyond Vne so did not t= est for long there.

Tracy

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:16 A= M, Greg Ward <gregw@onestopdesign.biz> wrote:
After everyone gets these different= =20 variations fired up, I would like to see the different horsepower/weight=20 figures.=A0 I think it would help all future builders to get a consensus of= =20 what works best.=A0 We saw weight and tunability as major factors=20 here.
Greg Ward
Lancair 20B in=20 Progress
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Steve=20 Parkins
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 10:= 48=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake=20 manifold

same thing i did,only with the inj. moved to the out side.= =20

steve parkins



=A0=20


--
Homepage:=A0
http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and=20 UnSub:=A0=A0=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html<= /a>

--0015175cdeb8deb62704675bdf1c--