Good response, Mark.
Aside from whatever the details are; I
was up at 14,500’ the other day, cruising along at 182 KTAS, in my
comfortable 4-place airplane, burning about 10 gph of $2.17/ga fuel; and doing it
very smo-o-o-othly. It’s the results that count.
Al (Velocity 20B)
-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Mark Steitle
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 5:26
AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re:
[Lancair_ES] Re: Rotary Engines
Thanks for adding a more technical tone to this
discussion. Yes, I was not accounting for all the misc pieces needed to
make the rotary run, but then I wasn't considering all the little pieces needed
to make a conventional piston engine run either. Of the pieces that
normally fail and end up poking out through the engine case, I think you'll
agree that the rotary has significantly fewer of those. In fact, I have
never seen a rotary with a thrown connecting rod. ;-)
Having a liquid cooling system is a two-edged sword,
but its not anything that can't be overcome with good engineering.
For coolant lines on my installation I used aluminum tubing connected to the
engine and radiator via "Wiggins" couplings. I
monitor coolant pressure, coolant level, and coolant temperature. Of
course, if I catch a Canadian goose in the radiator, it will likely loose its
ability to cool the engine, but then you have the same risk with an air-cooled
engine.
As for the bsfc, do your numbers reflect the
modern EFI systems, or carbureted engines. Tracy Crook realized a
significant improvement in bsfc when he switched from carburetors to
EFI. The new "Renesis" rotary engine has a better
bsfc due to the side exhaust ports. Anyway, I prefer to
consider it in "dollars per air-mile". By the time
you factor in the cost savings for purchasing and maintaining a rotary
engine over a certified engine, and that the rotary runs happily (prefers) on
89 UL fuel (half the cost of avgas), the cost per mile tips
significantly in favor of the rotary. (Reading the recent post
about the $2300.00 oil pan practically brought tears to my eyes.) I guess
its the German in me that caused me to seek out something better, or
different.
Ahhhh... you mentioned the magic word,
"turbo-charger". I built my engine with the intention
of turbo-charging as it was initially turbo-charged in its former
life. After much thought, I decided to follow the KISS principle and
go N/A. But there's a little voice in my head that keeps whispering
"turbo-charge". With the rotary's high energy exhaust gasses,
turbo's are a natural solution. Yes they add weight, but not much
more than my current exhaust system. Stay tuned...
One thing that I hadn't mentioned that could be
considered a negative for the rotary engine is that very few A&P's know
anything about rotary engines. Heck, very few auto mechanics know how to
work on a rotary engine. But, if I'm there with my repairman's
certificate in hand, who needs an A&P? Also, rotary parts are less
plentiful if you get stuck in some hole-in-the-wall town. But there is
always UPS overnight.
Gary, thanks again for your thoughtful post. I'm
not trying to convert anyone to a rotary engine, I only want to
see it get a fair shake.
P.S. I've CC'd the Fly Rotary group as they need
something to talk about (the list has been rather quiet lately).